1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0550-3213(97)00640-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Derivative expansion of the renormalization group in O(N) scalar field theory

Abstract: We apply a derivative expansion to the Legendre effective action flow equations of O(N) symmetric scalar field theory, making no other approximation. We calculate the critical exponents η, ν, and ω at the both the leading and second order of the expansion, associated to the three dimensional Wilson-Fisher fixed points, at various values of N. In addition, we show how the derivative expansion reproduces exactly known results, at special values N = ∞, −2, −4, · · ·.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
119
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(128 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
8
119
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We think that the second possibility is the right explanation. This is because one has already observed in the results of [29] a bad convergence on ω 1 and also on η * as functions of the number N of components of the field in the O (N)-symmetry whereas another choice of cut-off function, as done in [30], seems to be better adapted (see [31] for example). It is very likely that the fundamental reason why the Morris equation is not efficient must be looked for in the constraint imposed to the O (∂ 2 )-equations with a view to satisfy explicitly the reparameterization invariance.…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We think that the second possibility is the right explanation. This is because one has already observed in the results of [29] a bad convergence on ω 1 and also on η * as functions of the number N of components of the field in the O (N)-symmetry whereas another choice of cut-off function, as done in [30], seems to be better adapted (see [31] for example). It is very likely that the fundamental reason why the Morris equation is not efficient must be looked for in the constraint imposed to the O (∂ 2 )-equations with a view to satisfy explicitly the reparameterization invariance.…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[12]. The second example concerns the power-like regulator R power (q 2 ) = q 2 (k 2 /q 2 ) b for b = 2 in d = 3 dimensions [22]. It leads to ℓ power (ω) = 2π/ √ 2 + ω.…”
Section: From Erg To Ptrgmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The case m = 3 2 corresponds to the sharp cut-off [1], m = 2 to the quartic regulator R = k 4 /q 2 [22], and m = 5 2 to the optimal regulator R opt [10]. For m → ∞ we can rely on Eq.…”
Section: Comparison Of Critical Exponentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, in the limit n → ∞, the integrand in (25) is suppressed the least at the minimum of y(1+r), whence (27). Let us normalise all regulators by the requirement r( 1 2 ) = 1, in order to compare their respective radii of convergence.…”
Section: Convergencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We refer to regulators with C OPT = 1 as optimised. The extremisation of (27) is closely linked to a minimum sensitivity condition [16].…”
Section: Convergencementioning
confidence: 99%