2020
DOI: 10.1109/tcst.2019.2891222
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Derivative-Free Online Learning of Inverse Dynamics Models

Abstract: This paper discusses online algorithms for inverse dynamics modelling in robotics. Several model classes including rigid body dynamics (RBD) models, data-driven models and semiparametric models (which are a combination of the previous two classes) are placed in a common framework. While model classes used in the literature typically exploit joint velocities and accelerations, which need to be approximated resorting to numerical differentiation schemes, in this paper a new "derivative-free" framework is propose… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We are currently working on learning a full policy using a guided policy search [14] approach, where we can optimize trajectory and policy simultaneously. Moreover, we are investigating on how to apply GP online learning techniques [41], [42], [43], [26], [44], [45] to improve the model while iteratively improving the policy. Finally, we are interested in composing the prior physics knowledge with a neural network learning framework and compare it with the proposed semiparametric GP models [46].…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We are currently working on learning a full policy using a guided policy search [14] approach, where we can optimize trajectory and policy simultaneously. Moreover, we are investigating on how to apply GP online learning techniques [41], [42], [43], [26], [44], [45] to improve the model while iteratively improving the policy. Finally, we are interested in composing the prior physics knowledge with a neural network learning framework and compare it with the proposed semiparametric GP models [46].…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These approaches use any black-box function approximator as a transfer function and optimize the model parameters to fit the observed data. For example, the existing literature used Local Linear Models (Schaal et al 2002;Haruno et al 2001), Gaussian Mixture Models (Calinon et al 2010;Khansari-Zadeh and Billard 2011), Gaussian Processes (Kocijan et al 2004;Nguyen-Tuong et al 2009;Nguyen-Tuong and Peters 2010;Romeres et al 2019Romeres et al , 2016Camoriano et al 2016), Support Vector Machines (Choi et al 2007;Ferreira et al 2007), feedforward- (Jansen 1994;Lenz et al 2015;Ledezma and Haddadin 2017;Sanchez-Gonzalez et al 2018) or recurrent neural networks (Rueckert et al 2017;Ha and Schmidhuber 2018;Hafner et al 2019a,b) to learn the dynamics model. The black-box models obtain either the forward or inverse model and the learned model is only valid on the training data distribution.…”
Section: Data-driven Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Utilizing derivative-free features in the context of inverse dynamics has been proposed in [16] as a means to address the noisy nature of numerical differentiation, an inevitable step to obtain joint velocities and accelerations. Assuming we have access to the previous M joint positions, there are numerous ways to incorporate the state history as a feature.…”
Section: B Derivative-free Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%