2017
DOI: 10.3934/dcdss.2017017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Derivatives of slippery Devil's staircases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 22 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the possible interesting questions to ask, given the map S and the tree defined here, is whether or not a version of the Minkowski question mark function could be defined in this setting. We recall, briefly, that the original Minkowski question mark function was introduced as another way of demonstrating the Lagrange property of continued fractions, in that it maps every rational number to the subset of dyadic rationals (that is, those having denominators containing only powers of 2) and every quadratic irrational to the remaining rational numbers (see [15,10], and for other 1-dimensional analogues, [16,17]). These functions are now known as slippery Devil's staircases for the fact that they are strictly increasing but nevertheless singular with respect to the Lebesgue measure.…”
Section: (I)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the possible interesting questions to ask, given the map S and the tree defined here, is whether or not a version of the Minkowski question mark function could be defined in this setting. We recall, briefly, that the original Minkowski question mark function was introduced as another way of demonstrating the Lagrange property of continued fractions, in that it maps every rational number to the subset of dyadic rationals (that is, those having denominators containing only powers of 2) and every quadratic irrational to the remaining rational numbers (see [15,10], and for other 1-dimensional analogues, [16,17]). These functions are now known as slippery Devil's staircases for the fact that they are strictly increasing but nevertheless singular with respect to the Lebesgue measure.…”
Section: (I)mentioning
confidence: 99%