2017
DOI: 10.4007/annals.2017.185.2.5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Derived categories and Deligne-Lusztig varietiesII

Abstract: This paper is a continuation and a completion of [BoRo1]. We extend the Jordan decomposition of blocks: we show that blocks of finite groups of Lie type in non-describing characteristic are Morita equivalent to blocks of subgroups associated to isolated elements of the dual group -this is the modular version of a fundamental result of Lusztig, and the best approximation of the character-theoretic Jordan decomposition that can be obtained via Deligne-Lusztig varieties. The key new result is the invariance of th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
151
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(152 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
151
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Section 3 studies the effect of ℓ-adic field automorphisms on characters of finite reductive groups in characteristic different from ℓ. In Section 4 we refine the results of the previous section to the setting of the key reduction theorem of Bonnafé-Dat-Rouquier [5,Section 7]. Theorems 4.4 and 4.5 are then used to prove almost all of the results for blocks of the finite groups of Lie type in non-defining characteristic in Section 5; the remaining cases in type E 8 are dealt with on an ad hoc basis in Section 5.1.…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Section 3 studies the effect of ℓ-adic field automorphisms on characters of finite reductive groups in characteristic different from ℓ. In Section 4 we refine the results of the previous section to the setting of the key reduction theorem of Bonnafé-Dat-Rouquier [5,Section 7]. Theorems 4.4 and 4.5 are then used to prove almost all of the results for blocks of the finite groups of Lie type in non-defining characteristic in Section 5; the remaining cases in type E 8 are dealt with on an ad hoc basis in Section 5.1.…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Using an argument from the unpublished note [3] we show that the extended bimodule induces a Morita equivalence and from this we can deduce the validity of [2,Theorem 7.7] in this case.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…In this final section we prove that the extended bimodule induces a Morita equivalence. The following section borrows arguments from [3].…”
Section: Proof Of Morita Equivalencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this section, we shall show that this Morita equivalence is compatible with Harish-Chandra induction which also implies that it preserves and reflects the property of being imprimitive. To do so we shall need a result by Bonnafé, Dat and Rouquier from [1] which gives a sufficient condition for Lusztig induction to depend only on the Levi subgroup (and not on the parabolic subgroup).…”
Section: The Bonnafé -Rouquier Morita Equivalencementioning
confidence: 99%