2020
DOI: 10.3390/w12030617
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deriving a Bayesian Network to Assess the Retention Efficacy of Riparian Buffer Zones

Abstract: Bayesian networks (BN) have increasingly been applied in water management but not to estimate the efficacy of riparian buffer zones (RBZ). Our methodical study aims at evaluating the first BN to predict the RBZ efficacy to retain sediment and nutrients (dissolved, total, and particulate nitrogen and phosphorus) from widely available variables (width, vegetation, slope, soil texture, flow pathway, nutrient form). To evaluate the influence of parent nodes and how the number of states affects prediction errors, w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results indicate that buffer width is less important compared to length, and woody buffers should be as long as possible to prevent the continuous heating in unshaded reaches, similar to the conclusions drawn by Stanford et al (2020). However, wider buffers up to 30 m are known to increase other functions like nutrient retention (Gericke et al, 2020; Sweeney & Newbold, 2014).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results indicate that buffer width is less important compared to length, and woody buffers should be as long as possible to prevent the continuous heating in unshaded reaches, similar to the conclusions drawn by Stanford et al (2020). However, wider buffers up to 30 m are known to increase other functions like nutrient retention (Gericke et al, 2020; Sweeney & Newbold, 2014).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the properties of riparian buffers that optimize ecological benefits and ecosystem services remain unresolved. For instance, the efficiency of a riparian buffer in intercepting pollutants may depend on several factors, such as the width, the vegetation type, soil texture and slope [38]. The diversity and densities of insects within the buffer strips may also depend on the vegetation type and width of buffers [25,35,39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bayesian networks (BN) have increasingly been applied in water management but not to estimate the efficacy of riparian buffer zones (RBZ). The methodical study of Gericke et al [18] aims at evaluating the first BN for predicting RBZ efficacy in retaining sediment and nutrients (dissolved, total, and particulate nitrogen and phosphorus) from widely available variables (width, vegetation, slope, soil texture, flow pathway, nutrient form). To evaluate the influence of the parent nodes and how the number of states affected the prediction errors, they used a predefined general BN structure, collected 580 published datasets from North America and Europe, and performed classification tree analyses and multiple 10-fold cross-validations of different BNs.…”
Section: Monitoring and Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the derived BNs could support or replace simple design guidelines, they are limited for more detailed predictions. More representative data on vegetation or additional nodes, such as preferential flow, would probably improve the predictive power [18].…”
Section: Monitoring and Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%