2014
DOI: 10.5194/essd-6-339-2014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deriving a per-field land use and land cover map in an agricultural mosaic catchment

Abstract: Abstract. Detailed data on land use and land cover constitute important information for Earth system models, environmental monitoring and ecosystem services research. Global land cover products are evolving rapidly; however, there is still a lack of information particularly for heterogeneous agricultural landscapes. We censused land use and land cover field by field in the agricultural mosaic catchment Haean in South Korea. We recorded the land cover types with additional information on agricultural practice. … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We used the Maximum Likelihood Classifier Tool in the Spatial Analyst Toolbox in ArcGIS (v10.2) to perform a per-field supervised classification. Similarly to Seo et al (2014), we digitised a set of training fields (parcels) over the ground truth locations (digitisation of field records). Given the spatial homogeneity of the backscatter patches surrounding the ground truth locations we used 1-m² square polygon fields to map all classes except the sponge class, for which circular and irregular fields were used.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used the Maximum Likelihood Classifier Tool in the Spatial Analyst Toolbox in ArcGIS (v10.2) to perform a per-field supervised classification. Similarly to Seo et al (2014), we digitised a set of training fields (parcels) over the ground truth locations (digitisation of field records). Given the spatial homogeneity of the backscatter patches surrounding the ground truth locations we used 1-m² square polygon fields to map all classes except the sponge class, for which circular and irregular fields were used.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rice paddies (8%) and residential areas (3%) (e.g., roads and artificial structures) occupy the flat central area of the catchment. Semi-natural vegetation field (8%), shrublands (1%), and bare surface (5%), including fallow and barren field, cover the remaining areas [35].…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vegetation structures contain the permanent interception of rainfall (PI), pervious ground cover (GC), canopy cover (CC), average vegetation height (PH), average diameter of individual plant elements at the surface (D), and number of individual plant elements per unit area (NV). LULC parameters were derived based on the LULC map of the Haean catchment in the year 2010 from Seo et al [35] (see Figure 5). .…”
Section: Model Parameterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, their use has been limited by poor revisit times, coarse spatial resolution, and/or cloudy weather. They technically conceal delicate fluctuations of ecosystem productivity tightly associated with perfield ecological conditions on which plants survival and dispersal depend (Seo et al, 2014). Applications of spatially coarse satellite products generate considerable spatiotemporal uncertainties in evaluating strength of daily carbon fluxes among microsites of the same plant function type at principle growth stages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%