2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.infsof.2019.01.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deriving architectural models from requirements specifications: A systematic mapping study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Usually, the implementational and organizational aspects show a large-scale variance. Not only is the application development technology different, but also basic design principles such as the type of program, backbone design paradigms, and general usage philosophy [12][13][14]. Furthermore, the volume of data traffic per layer and between layers could easily be different.…”
Section: Background and Significancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Usually, the implementational and organizational aspects show a large-scale variance. Not only is the application development technology different, but also basic design principles such as the type of program, backbone design paradigms, and general usage philosophy [12][13][14]. Furthermore, the volume of data traffic per layer and between layers could easily be different.…”
Section: Background and Significancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Software similarity measurements using UML diagrams: A systematic literature review http://doi.org/10.26594/register.v8i1.2248 modification of the Souza metric [5]. These consistency norms incorporate inquiries evaluating the quality of a report and its contribution to the SLR's range.…”
Section: Quality Assurance and Data Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Study quality assessment is not a mandatory practice in case of a SMS. However, based on some recent SMS [50][51][52][53], we decided to include a quality assessment step into our mapping protocol. Based on Kitchenham and Charters guidelines [31], we firstly constructed a quality assessment checklist comprising of ten questions that cover several study aspects including design, conduct, data analysis and conclusion.…”
Section: Study Quality Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Study quality assessment is not a mandatory practice in case of a SMS. However, based on some recent SMS [50][51][52][53], we decided to include a quality assessment step into our mapping protocol.…”
Section: Study Quality Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%