2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2021.04.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deriving reference values for nerve conduction studies from existing data using mixture model clustering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Obtaining reference values has been a challenge, and published reports yielded only one study of sufficient quality, according to a recent systematic review 1 . Therefore, attempts have been made to estimate reference values by various statistical models 24,25 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Obtaining reference values has been a challenge, and published reports yielded only one study of sufficient quality, according to a recent systematic review 1 . Therefore, attempts have been made to estimate reference values by various statistical models 24,25 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Therefore, attempts have been made to estimate reference values by various statistical models. 24,25 Our study meets most criteria described by the NDTF to evaluate studies for normative standard. Several limitations remain.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This corresponds to previous research showing lower N1P1 oVEMP amplitudes in older adults 10 and lower CMAP amplitudes in a healthy older adults. 17 Unfortunately, these findings might reduce the clinical utility of the ROVEMP. The average age at onset of MG is 44 years, 18 and because the subjective quality of the ROVEMP signal and objective measures such as the N2P2 amplitude decline with age, the quality of a measurement must be taken into account for older patients in clinical practice because diagnostic yield seems to be low in subjects older than 55 years.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lack of sufficient data about the reference value of nerve conduction study and the debate on the interpretation of results is worldwide in the literature until now. Considerable debate remains about using RVs available in the literature and RVs collected in individual clinical neurophysiology departments [ 11 ]. Publicly available RVs for NCS are rare; a recent systematic review only found one set of RVs of sufficient quality for a small number of measurements [ 12 ].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a statistical approach is not uncommon. In a study, R. H. Reijntjes and his colleagues [ 11 ] developed a mixture module to diagnose abnormality in nerve conduction study and concluded that ± 2 SD of normal is the proper diagnosis of abnormality.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%