2020
DOI: 10.3390/rs12111854
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deriving Stand Structural Complexity from Airborne Laser Scanning Data—What Does It Tell Us about a Forest?

Abstract: The three-dimensional forest structure is an important driver of several ecosystem functions and services. Recent advancements in laser scanning technologies have set the path to measuring structural complexity directly from 3D point clouds. Here, we show that the box-dimension (Db) from fractal analysis, a measure of structural complexity, can be obtained from airborne laser scanning data. Based on 66 plots across different forest types in Germany, each 1 ha in size, we tested the performance of the Db by eva… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A large variation in forest structures due to different stand managements and forest types have already been documented for our sites in earlier studies using laser scanning-based measures (cf. Ehbrecht et al 2017;Seidel et al 2020). The silvopastures were statistically not significantly different from the forest reference and only had a slightly lower mean, median and lower maximum complexity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large variation in forest structures due to different stand managements and forest types have already been documented for our sites in earlier studies using laser scanning-based measures (cf. Ehbrecht et al 2017;Seidel et al 2020). The silvopastures were statistically not significantly different from the forest reference and only had a slightly lower mean, median and lower maximum complexity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The performed Kruskal-Wallis test revealed significant differences in the D b measure (D b summer-D b winter divided by D b winter) comparing all vitality groups with each other. Since the box-dimension can be derived from repeated measurements and for large areas, for example, using airborne laser scanning as shown in the previous studies (Seidel et al, 2020;Camarretta et al, 2021), it might be a useful tool to derive objective forest vitality estimates in deciduous forests. Following our case study, we suggest further research that compares the results of the leaf-on vs. leaf-off difference in boxdimension to more objective vitality indicators than the visually assessed crown defoliation.…”
Section: Tree Vitality Assessment Based On Box-dimensionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our current understanding of the morphological diversity of biological forms is strongly dependent on the effectiveness of available geometric, computational, and information methodologies in morphometrics. Approaches to clearly and completely describe the morphology of biological forms are still challenging [20,21]. Therefore, it is essential in design studies to find a more improved and automated method that minimizes information loss and time consumption.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%