2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2010.11.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deriving the primary cumulative distribution function of fracture stress for brittle materials from 3- and 4-point bending tests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(3 reference statements)
0
15
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…25 Alternatively, Schula et al 26 suggested the use of the log-normal distribution. Questions have been raised about the existence of a threshold for the glass strength, 22,27 presenting arguments in support of this conjecture. 28 Following this rationale, the use of a threeparameter 22,27 or left-truncated Weibull distributions 28 have been indicated as a possibility.…”
Section: The Assumed Statistical Distributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…25 Alternatively, Schula et al 26 suggested the use of the log-normal distribution. Questions have been raised about the existence of a threshold for the glass strength, 22,27 presenting arguments in support of this conjecture. 28 Following this rationale, the use of a threeparameter 22,27 or left-truncated Weibull distributions 28 have been indicated as a possibility.…”
Section: The Assumed Statistical Distributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over recent years, probabilistic failure models have been developed that take into account the statistical scatter of concrete strength in the estimation of the number of fatigue cycles [28,[60][61][62][63].…”
Section: Probabilistic Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, if the optimum is achieved with a zero value of threshold stress, this set will be fitted to a two-parameter Weibull distribution. The Weibull cdf was originally proposed to characterize the probability of failure of a uni-axially and uniformly tensioned materials (Figure 7) [21,22]. It assumes that the random nature of the spatial distribution of defects implies that the strength will decrease with an increase of the stressed area because the probability of having a critical defect will also increase.…”
Section: Statistical Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%