1997
DOI: 10.1075/cilt.146.04ant
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deriving Variation from Grammar

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
104
0
3

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 378 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
104
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In generative phonology, underlying lexical items may be changed by phonological derivation, which begins with the application of lexical phonological rules, followed by the application of post-lexical phonological rules (Kiparsky, 1982(Kiparsky, , 1985(Kiparsky, , 1993Anttila, 1997). Coetzee & Pater (2011) used the more neutral terms of early and late phonology to avoid characterizing the distinction between different levels of the phonological grammar in a too theory-specific way.…”
Section: Variation In Phonologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In generative phonology, underlying lexical items may be changed by phonological derivation, which begins with the application of lexical phonological rules, followed by the application of post-lexical phonological rules (Kiparsky, 1982(Kiparsky, , 1985(Kiparsky, , 1993Anttila, 1997). Coetzee & Pater (2011) used the more neutral terms of early and late phonology to avoid characterizing the distinction between different levels of the phonological grammar in a too theory-specific way.…”
Section: Variation In Phonologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These models have all been developed in some version of a constraint-based grammar, be that classic discrete Optimality Theory (OT) (Anttila 1997(Anttila , 2002a(Anttila , 2006(Anttila , 2007Anttila et al 2008;Bane to appear a, b;Coetzee 2004Coetzee , 2006Coetzee , 2009cKiparsky 1993;Reynolds 1994), stochastic OT (Boersma 1997;Boersma and Hayes 2001), or noisy Harmonic Grammar (HG) (Coetzee 2009a;Coetzee and Pater to appear;Jesney 2007) 1 .…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our claim is that there is: In English, the s-plural This avoids both construction-specific rules and unenlightening listing of allomorph environments and follows the OT analysis of allomorphy and lexical selection in many earlier studies, beginning with Mester 1994 for Latin (see Anttila 1997, Burzio 1994, Kager 1996, Mascaró 1996a, Perlmutter 1998, Russell 1995, Tranel 1996a. This leads to a TETU-effect for such listed pairs of allomorphs (Mascaró 1996b)--here, postnasal voicing in tandem with default voicelessness--in thoroughly foreign territory, where IDENT-F otherwise prevents any changes in voicing.…”
Section: Tetu Ii: Allomorphy and Faithfulness Neutralizationmentioning
confidence: 99%