2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2022.113463
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dermal exposure to synthetic musks: Human health risk assessment, mechanism, and control strategy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, the binding free energy between PAHs and their toxic receptor was used as the activity parameter to characterize the toxicity of PAHs. With a Dell PowerEdge R7425 server, Groningen Machine for Chemical Simulation (GROMACS, Berendsen Laboratory, Göttingen University, Göttingen, Germany) 4.6.5 was applied to achieve the molecular dynamics simulations of PAHs and toxic receptor complex [ 52 , 53 , 54 ]. The molecular mechanics Poisson–Boltzmann surface area (MM/PBSA) method was used to calculate the binding free energy between PAHs and the toxic receptor complex [ 55 ] ( Table S2 in Supplementary Materials ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, the binding free energy between PAHs and their toxic receptor was used as the activity parameter to characterize the toxicity of PAHs. With a Dell PowerEdge R7425 server, Groningen Machine for Chemical Simulation (GROMACS, Berendsen Laboratory, Göttingen University, Göttingen, Germany) 4.6.5 was applied to achieve the molecular dynamics simulations of PAHs and toxic receptor complex [ 52 , 53 , 54 ]. The molecular mechanics Poisson–Boltzmann surface area (MM/PBSA) method was used to calculate the binding free energy between PAHs and the toxic receptor complex [ 55 ] ( Table S2 in Supplementary Materials ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optimal principal component n for the W-3D-QSAR model is 8, and the crossvalidation coefficient q2 is 0.76. The value indicates that the model has a good predictive ability [39]. The non-cross validation coefficient R2 is 0.999, the standard deviation SEE is 0.009, and the F test value is 1159.179, indicating that the model has good fitting ability and stability.…”
Section: Evaluation Of the 3d-qsar Model To Study The Comprehensive E...mentioning
confidence: 96%