2015
DOI: 10.4103/0019-5278.174001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dermatological and respiratory problems in migrant construction workers of Udupi, Karnataka

Abstract: Background:India being a developing country has tremendous demand of physical infrastructure and construction work as a result there is a raising demand of construction workers. Workers in construction industry are mainly migratory and employed on contract or subcontract basis. These workers face temporary relationship between employer and employee, uncertainty in working hours, contracting and subcontracting system, lack of basic continuous employment, lack basic amenities, and inadequacy in welfare schemes.O… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…36.2% of workers suffered from dermatological problems, of which 116 (94.3%) said that signs of these problems began after the start of the job. Rashes (9.7%), redness (16.2%), and skin rash with pruritus (30.9%) were the most common dermatological symptoms [43].…”
Section: Various Diseasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…36.2% of workers suffered from dermatological problems, of which 116 (94.3%) said that signs of these problems began after the start of the job. Rashes (9.7%), redness (16.2%), and skin rash with pruritus (30.9%) were the most common dermatological symptoms [43].…”
Section: Various Diseasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies also reported more or less similar findings, such as 26.25 ± 8.49 years and 26 ± 8.2 years. [ 12 , 23 ]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there were ‘no’ responses to some questions indicating the possibility of bias in some of the results. Based on our assessment, 11 out of the 25 studies12 13 21–29 either did not identify confounding factors or provided unclear confounders which suggest a potential risk of bias in those studies. Additionally, 6 studies9 30–34 out of the 14 studies that identified the presence of confounders provided unclear strategies used to deal with the confounding factors.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%