2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2007.11.058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Desalination performance of a carbon-based composite electrode

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
33
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During the CDI operation, ions are electrosorbed at the electrode surface, and once the potential is removed, the adsorbed ions are quickly released back into the bulk solution. Thus, CDI has been regarded as an environmentally friendly process because no acids, bases, or salts are required to regenerate the electrode surface [5][6][7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the CDI operation, ions are electrosorbed at the electrode surface, and once the potential is removed, the adsorbed ions are quickly released back into the bulk solution. Thus, CDI has been regarded as an environmentally friendly process because no acids, bases, or salts are required to regenerate the electrode surface [5][6][7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, similar electrodes fabricated from activated carbon and PVDF as a binder, were found to have a CDI salt removal efficiency of only 78% (Choi, 2010). Enhanced CDI performance has also been shown by Lee et al (Lee et al, 2009) through the incorporation of an ion exchange resin into an activated carbon powder electrode.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typically hydrophobic polymers such as poly(tetrafluoroethylene) (PTFE) (Chang et al, 2012;Lee et al, 2009) or poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF) (Zhang et al, 2012) are used to bind activated carbon powder. However, these binders can hinder ion access to the pores and reduce the wettability of an electrode (Park and Choi, 2010;Park et al, 2011), reducing adsorption capacity, may be susceptible to chemical attack, and yield electrodes with poor electrical conductivity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The activated carbon electrodes, however, exhibited a large degree of hydrophobicity compared to the carbon cloth due to the presence of a hydrophobic PTFE binder. The contact angle was not specifically measured for this material, but reports in the literature place the contact angle at about 1150 [16]. Although the ratio of the PTFE to the activated carbon tends to be low (10-25%), it has a significant effect on the hydrophobicity of the sample which subsequently affects the effective capacitance for an aqueous electrolyte [16].…”
Section: Electrochemical Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%