Desarrollo institucional y caracterización del centro de gobierno en Uruguay

Milanesi, Alejandro; Gadea, Victoria)

doi:10.26851/rucp.v26n2.5

Cited by 4 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Most probably, the accurate answer is 'It depends. ' The specific literature assessing the cases of Brazil Cavalcante & Batista, 2019;Fleischmann, 2019), Chile (Baraona & Herrera, 2011;Palacios & Jofré, 2016), and Uruguay (Lanzaro, 2016;Milanesi & Gadea, 2017) shows -as highlighted before -how the needs of different presidents shape the design of these agencies. Yet, it is still unclear how successful each strategy was.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 98%

“…The first exception regards regional reports, which mostly derived from the work of Alessandro et al (2014) under the umbrella of the Inter-American Development Bank. When it comes to country cases, this field of study is most developed in Brazil (e.g., Cavalcante & Batista, 2019), followed by recent studies in Uruguay (Lanzaro, 2016;Milanesi & Gadea, 2017) and Chile (Baraona & Herrera, 2011;Franco, 2012;Palacios & Jofré, 2016).…”

Section: Parliamentarismmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Vázquez's strategy also included the creation of sectoral cabinets, i.e., councils composed of ministries of related areas. However, they were downplayed in the Mujica administration (2010)(2011)(2012)(2013)(2014)(2015)) (Lanzaro, 2016;Milanesi & Gadea, 2017). During his second administration, Vázquez (2015-2020) reduced the power of different ministries by creating secretaries under the umbrella of the presidency (Milanesi & Gadea, 2017).…”

Section: Coalitionalmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…However, they were downplayed in the Mujica administration (2010)(2011)(2012)(2013)(2014)(2015)) (Lanzaro, 2016;Milanesi & Gadea, 2017). During his second administration, Vázquez (2015-2020) reduced the power of different ministries by creating secretaries under the umbrella of the presidency (Milanesi & Gadea, 2017). That is, those areas which were strategic to the presidency were transferred to structures that worked closer to the presidential office than structures that could be led by distant political allies.…”

Section: Coalitionalmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Mapping the center of government in Latin America and the Caribbean: a typology

Guedes-Neto

2021

Rev. Adm. Pública

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Over two decades ago, Bardach (1998, p. 4) highlighted a core problem of public administration: “Agencies cooperate? Of course not!” One of the solutions identified by scholars and practitioners has been the center of government (CoG), that is, organizations created by elected officials to facilitate inter-ministerial cooperation for the design and implementation of priority policies. Originally developed in European parliamentary systems or at Franklin Roosevelt’s presidential center in the United States, the CoG has recently gained momentum in Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) after a collective effort between the IDB and the OECD. This paper maps the historical path and most recent institutional design of CoG organizations in 27 LAC countries as of 2020. The outcome of an exhaustive data collection process is a typology with five dimensions and 15 ideal types that help scholars and practitioners to better understand how and why these organizations have now been widely adopted in the region.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 98%

Section: Parliamentarismmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Coalitionalmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Coalitionalmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Mapping the center of government in Latin America and the Caribbean: a typology

Guedes-Neto

2021

Rev. Adm. Pública

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…A pesar de que la mayoría de los trabajos sobre los CP se han centrado en el caso de Estados Unidos, en los últimos años el estudio de los CP se trasladó a estudiar los casos de América Latina. Se han desarrollado trabajos que estudian la formación y desarrollo de los CP de América Latina, como el CP de Chile (Pliscoff, 2018;Dumas, et al, 2013;Siavelis, 2016;Palacios y Jofre, 2016), el CP de Colombia (Botero, et al, 2018), el CP de Uruguay (Lanzaro, 2016;Milanesi y Gadea, 2016) y el CP de Argentina (Coutinho 2008(Coutinho , 2013(Coutinho , 2016Camerlo y Coutinho, 2015).…”

Section: Antecedentes Y Marco Teóricounclassified

Los Centros Presidenciales de Argentina, Brasil y Uruguay en perspectiva comparada (1983-2019)

Curto

2023

REVSAAP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Resumen: Los Centros Presidenciales (CP) son el grupo de instituciones que proveen apoyo directo al presidente, están subordinadas directamente a él y tienen como función apoyarlo en las tareas de gobierno. Los estudios del CP se han concentrado en el caso de Estados Unidos, donde su CP ha aumentado de tamaño en forma constante en el tiempo. Sin embargo, recientemente diversos autores han comenzado a analizar los CP en América Latina, donde existen casos que presentan trayectorias diferentes. Esto lleva a preguntarse ¿Por qué cambia el tamaño del CP? El objetivo general del trabajo es analizar las causas del cambio en el tamaño del Centro Presidencial en Argentina, Brasil y Uruguay en el período 1983-2019. Los resultados muestran que los presidentes modifican el CP en respuesta a situaciones de incertidumbre política.

show abstract

The Center of Government, Revisited: A Decade of Global Reforms

Shostak¹,

Alessandro²,

Diamond³

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The institutions and units at the Center of Government (CoG) provide managerial direction and coherence to the complex machinery of government to accelerate the delivery of its priority objectives. In recent years, economic, social, political, and technological transformations have reshaped the functions of the CoG, as well as the tools available to CoG practitioners. For example, the acceleration of multidimensional transformations and disruptions--including pandemics, climate hazards, economic crises, technological developments, and global conflicts--has enhanced the value of anticipatory governance and foresight, cross-ministerial planning and policy design, and real-time performance monitoring and intervention. This publication takes stock of these and other innovations, based on learnings from a decade of reforms, globally and in Latin America and the Caribbean. It presents both an updated conceptual understanding of the work of the CoG and a set of specific routines, instruments, and step-by-step actions that should be considered in the process of strengthening the CoG capacity. It also includes an assessment tool to guide practitioners in identifying the key CoG functions and activities most in need of development or enhancement in their specific context.

show abstract

Desarrollo institucional y caracterización del centro de gobierno en Uruguay

Cited by 4 publications

References 3 publications

Mapping the center of government in Latin America and the Caribbean: a typology

Mapping the center of government in Latin America and the Caribbean: a typology

Los Centros Presidenciales de Argentina, Brasil y Uruguay en perspectiva comparada (1983-2019)

The Center of Government, Revisited: A Decade of Global Reforms

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About