2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-23544-3_17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Describing Analytical Sessions Using a Multidimensional Algebra

Abstract: Abstract. Recent efforts to support analytical tasks over relational sources have pointed out the necessity to come up with flexible, powerful means for analyzing the issued queries and exploit them in decisionoriented processes (such as query recommendation or physical tuning). Issued queries should be decomposed, stored and manipulated in a dedicated subsystem. With this aim, we present a novel approach for representing SQL analytical queries in terms of a multidimensional algebra, which better characterizes… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our more recent work, we used supervised learning to identify a set of query features allowing to characterize focus zones in OLAP explorations [5], or to identify queries that better contribute to an exploration [4]. The present work can be seen as a continuation of those previous works, since we have the same objective as [18] and use the same technique as [4]. The main differences with these previous works is that we make no assumption about the type of queries in the workload (particularly, they may not be multidimensional queries), and we have no ground truth (i.e., no human manual inspection of each query) on the workload.…”
Section: Workload Analysismentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In our more recent work, we used supervised learning to identify a set of query features allowing to characterize focus zones in OLAP explorations [5], or to identify queries that better contribute to an exploration [4]. The present work can be seen as a continuation of those previous works, since we have the same objective as [18] and use the same technique as [4]. The main differences with these previous works is that we make no assumption about the type of queries in the workload (particularly, they may not be multidimensional queries), and we have no ground truth (i.e., no human manual inspection of each query) on the workload.…”
Section: Workload Analysismentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Analysis graphs may also be complemented with a representation of the interactive dynamics for visual analysis. 44 Other work 45 has proposed a multidimensional algebra which allows for the description of analytical sessions, providing operators similar to the navigation operators in analysis graphs. Selection corresponds to the slice conditions in analysis situations that can be expressed by dimensional, multidimensional, and measure predicates.…”
Section: Modeling Of Analytical Queries and Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among these (see (Marcel and Negre, 2011) and (Negre, 2009) for a detailed study), some focused on exploiting user profiles and preferences (Bellatreche et al, 2005;Jerbi et al, 2009b), and others focused on the discoveries made during analyses (Cariou et al, 2008;Sarawagi, 2000) as well as on exploiting logs containing sequences of queries previously run by other users on the same cube (Chatzopoulou et al, 2009;Giacometti et al, 2008Giacometti et al, , 2009Giacometti et al, , 2011Sapia, 1999;Yang et al, 2009). More recently, Romero et al (2011) proposed a multidimensional algebra for describing analytical sessions.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%