Describing and comparing landscapes using tags, texts, and free lists: an interdisciplinary approach

Abstract

How do people perceive landscapes? What elements of the landscape do they identify as characteristic of a landscape? And how can we arrive at descriptions, and ultimately representations that better reflect people's notions of landscapes? In this study, we collected landscape descriptions from five landscape types at 10 study sites in Switzerland. For each site, we collected data from three sources: free lists with participants, hiking blogs, and Flickr tags. Free lists were obtained through on-site interviews with visitors, hiking blogs were gathered by focused crawling of web content, and Flickr tags were selected based on spatial footprints obtained from the hiking blogs. We quantitatively compared landscape descriptions between data sources and landscape types using cosine similarity. We found that descriptions from the same data source were significantly more similar, irrespective of landscape type. Descriptions from the same landscape type were more similar, but only within the same data source. Through a qualitative analysis of different aspects of landscape in our content, we found that each data source offered a different distribution of landscape aspects. For example, while Flickr tags contained high proportions of toponyms, they contained little content relating to sense of place. In contrast, hiking blogs contained more information about sense of place. Our approach combining these varied textual sources thus offers a more holistic view on landscapes. This study constitutes a step toward extracting semantically rich descriptions of landscapes from a variety of sources and using this information to distinguish different landscapes, with potential applications for landscape monitoring and management.

Monitoring the pulse of renewed Spanish waterfront cities through instasights

“…from a general perspective, the process of transforming these areas throughout history has been directly connected with global economic and technological changes in shipping and city-marketing strategies [12]. This is not a new approach to the process of city renovation.…”

“…In fact, the perception of the urban environment is commonly approached by researchers from location based social networks (lBSNs) [5]. These include the following: Twitter [6] and/or foursquare [7] via sentiment analysis [8]; and, geolocated photo-based social networks such as flickr [9]- [12]; Panoramio [13] (no longer available since November 4, 2016) and Instagram [10], [14], [15]. Some of these studies suggest that spatial perception nuances can be richer using complementary data sources [16].…”

A Review of Geospatial Semantic Information Modeling and Elicitation Approaches

“…The approach extracts toponyms using the Swissnames (https://shop.swisstopo.admin.ch/en/products/landscape/names3D) gazetteer which are linked to nouns referring to natural features using linguistic processing and manual annotation based on predefined rules. In another study of people's perceptions of landscapes and their prominent characteristics, Wartmann et al [127] collected landscape descriptions of five landscape types across three different sources (participant free lists obtained through interviews, hiking blogs, and Flickr tags). The sources were manually annotated based on a coding scheme including toponyms, biophysical, cultural, and perceptual landscape elements, activities, sense of place, and people.…”

Exploring Public Recognition and Perceived Cultural Value of the Special Qualities within English Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty

“…The difficulty of assigning cultural benefits of landscape to the ES framework has been heavily researched and criticised [14]. Henceforth, following recommendations in Wartman et al, 2018) [15], this assessment will focus on the landscape elements with which cultural meanings are associated. Past studies have focused too heavily on landscape elements rather than what is benefited from said elements [6], therefore it is important this link is explored.…”