2016
DOI: 10.1002/ece3.2609
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Describing and understanding behavioral responses to multiple stressors and multiple stimuli

Abstract: SummaryUnderstanding the effects of environmental change on natural ecosystems is a major challenge, particularly when multiple stressors interact to produce unexpected “ecological surprises” in the form of complex, nonadditive effects that can amplify or reduce their individual effects. Animals often respond behaviorally to environmental change, and multiple stressors can have both population‐level and community‐level effects. However, the individual, not combined, effects of stressors on animal behavior are … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result may be due simply to chance although it is also possible that there is some synergism occurring between the two sensory modalities (Hale et al. ). More work is needed to explore if this is a biologically meaningful result, and if so, its underlying cause.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result may be due simply to chance although it is also possible that there is some synergism occurring between the two sensory modalities (Hale et al. ). More work is needed to explore if this is a biologically meaningful result, and if so, its underlying cause.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the complexity of the systems in which responses are measured may hamper generalizable explanations and prediction, differences in (1) interaction classification frameworks, which define mathematically what constitutes a synergistic and antagonistic interaction (for details see Hale, Piggott, & Swearer, 2017) and (2) the type of null models underlying such frameworks add to the variability in reported interaction types, thus limiting comparability. The selected null model should ideally be underpinned by a mechanistic understanding of single/multiple stressor effects, determined by the stressor/s mode of action and stressor-effect relationship/s (Figure 1a), although to date this has been largely overlooked due to statistical convenience.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple stressors can act: synergistically (outcome is stronger than predicted based on the sum of the individual effects); antagonistically (outcome is weaker than predicted based on the sum of the individual effects); additively (equal to the sum of the individual effects, i.e. no interaction); or even produce an 'ecological surprise', such as when two stressors exhibit no effects in isolation, but do together (Crain et al, 2008;Hale et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%