2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.11.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Describing Storm Xaver in disaster terms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the northeastern Atlantic region (Figures S14 and S22), the spatial footprint of the storm surge caused by Extratropical Cyclone Ophelia (in 2017; Dullaart et al, 2020) is represented by Cluster 14. The spatial footprint of Cyclone Xaver (in 2013), which caused extreme storm surges in eastern United Kingdom, Belgium, the Netherlands, Denmark, Germany, and southern Scandinavia (Rucińska, 2019), is reflected in Cluster 5. Our sensitivity analysis (Figures S28 to S30) highlights that the spatial footprints are not biased toward these individual extreme events; instead, it indicates that many other events had similar footprints but were smaller in height and intensity (while still exceeding the 95% or 99% percentile thresholds) and therefore did not cause significant damages.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the northeastern Atlantic region (Figures S14 and S22), the spatial footprint of the storm surge caused by Extratropical Cyclone Ophelia (in 2017; Dullaart et al, 2020) is represented by Cluster 14. The spatial footprint of Cyclone Xaver (in 2013), which caused extreme storm surges in eastern United Kingdom, Belgium, the Netherlands, Denmark, Germany, and southern Scandinavia (Rucińska, 2019), is reflected in Cluster 5. Our sensitivity analysis (Figures S28 to S30) highlights that the spatial footprints are not biased toward these individual extreme events; instead, it indicates that many other events had similar footprints but were smaller in height and intensity (while still exceeding the 95% or 99% percentile thresholds) and therefore did not cause significant damages.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One senses the legitimacy and progressive openness to the mutual exchange of data, information and knowledge, which should be interpreted as a testimony that a common focus on insuring the security of the state and its citizens, regardless of the circumstances, is emerging. This also includes civil planning implemented as part of the crisis management system, critical infrastructure protection standards, developing problems of business continuity management, as well as scientific and didactic activities [11,13,27].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The coinciding surge and tide created "record breaking water levels for large parts of the southwestern German North Sea coastline" (Dangendorf et al, 2016), which boosted the estimate of the water level with a 1:200 year probability exceedance by 40 cm. Although the storm led to large direct damage in United Kingdom (UK), Netherlands, Germany and Denmark (Wadey et al, 2015;Rucińska, 2019), the considerable improvements in coastal protection and disaster risk reduction management significantly reduced the total damage and number of people affected compared to a similar storm in 1953 (Spencer et al, 2015;Wadey et al, 2015). Both the large anomaly of the storm and the complex cascade of impacts (particularly relating to the macroeconomic losses from long-term business interruption, damage to transportation networks and other critical infrastructure) create deep uncertainty that is difficult to assess using probabilistic approaches.…”
Section: Application Domainmentioning
confidence: 99%