Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Mathematics and Science Education 2017
DOI: 10.2991/icmsed-16.2017.4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Describing Teachers' Pedagogic Content Knowledge about Reasoning Development and Students' Reasoning Test

Abstract: Abstract-Pedagogic Content Knowledge (PCK) is veryimportant for teachers because it shows teacher understanding of science knowledge and pedagogical knowledge. PCK covers the knowledge of content and pedagogy such as teaching knowledge (the subject knowledge and their belief in that, and how to teach it), curriculum knowledge (what and when to teach), assessment knowledge (why, what, and how to assess), the knowledge of students' comprehension toward the subject, and instructional knowledge. To assess teacher … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They have science and environmental education class in the school. The instrument was a scientific informal reasoning test that collects students' argumentative skills regarding air quality adapted from air pollution problems that was modified from Sukardi et al [17]. Scientific argumentation is a form of reasoning skills.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They have science and environmental education class in the school. The instrument was a scientific informal reasoning test that collects students' argumentative skills regarding air quality adapted from air pollution problems that was modified from Sukardi et al [17]. Scientific argumentation is a form of reasoning skills.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Students' arguments were analyzed based on the existence of the argument components, then classified them based on their quality. The rubric used was the Sukardi rubric [17]. Students' answers are classified based on the completeness of their arguments.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kegiatan belajar mengajar yang hanya memanfaatkan bahan ajar seadanya seperti buku pegangan guru dan siswa, dapat mengakibatkan pembelajaran kurang menarik bagi siswa (Sukardi et al, 2021(Sukardi et al, , 2017. Dibutuhkan bahan ajar yang menarik dan inovatif bagi kemajuan mutu pendidikan.…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified