2010
DOI: 10.1080/00288231003606054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Description and evaluation of the Farmax Dairy Pro decision support model

Abstract: Decision support models have been developed to assist management in dairy systems. This paper describes Farmax Dairy Pro (a pastoral grazing model of a dairy farm) and presents an evaluation of it using two independent farmlet studies carried out in Hamilton and Palmerston North, New Zealand with spring-calving dairy cows. Farmax Dairy Pro predicted, to a high degree of accuracy, mean annual yields (per cow and per hectare) for milk, fat, protein and milksolids (MS; fat'protein) and mean annual concentrations … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
43
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The accuracy of prediction was moderate for LW and BCS, when considering the CCC (Table 1). These levels of accuracy of prediction for DM intake and milk yield are similar or higher than those reported for other models for grazing dairy systems, such as Farmax Dairy Pro (Bryant et al, 2010), GrazeIn (Delagarde et al, 2011) and the WFM (Beukes et al, 2008). However, it is important to notice that the validation of the model was conducted for annual outputs, and the accuracy of the model for short-term predictions (weekly or monthly basis) remains to be tested.…”
Section: Model Validationsupporting
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The accuracy of prediction was moderate for LW and BCS, when considering the CCC (Table 1). These levels of accuracy of prediction for DM intake and milk yield are similar or higher than those reported for other models for grazing dairy systems, such as Farmax Dairy Pro (Bryant et al, 2010), GrazeIn (Delagarde et al, 2011) and the WFM (Beukes et al, 2008). However, it is important to notice that the validation of the model was conducted for annual outputs, and the accuracy of the model for short-term predictions (weekly or monthly basis) remains to be tested.…”
Section: Model Validationsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Some of these models work at a herd level (Larcombe, 1990;Freer et al, 1997;Shalloo et al, 2004;Schils et al, 2007;Vayssiè res et al, 2009), whereas other models work at an individual animal level (Beukes et al, 2008;Bryant et al, 2010). These latter models account for genetic differences between cows, but they were designed to be used under specific conditions, that is, grass-based dairy systems and their environmental conditions under which the breeding values were estimated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Production and financial costs of clover soil disease were analysed using Farmax Dairy Pro decision support models (Bryant et al 2010) of the Southland, Canterbury, and Waikato-BOP Monitor Dairy farms of Year 2012/13. The model assumed that removing clover soil disease constraints would increase average clover yield by 28.5 %.…”
Section: Economic Modelling Of Clover Disease Costmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, output validation indicates a model's ability to adequately describe reality and thus is an important activity that practitioners should seek to practice, where possible. Table 3 presents unpublished validation output that compares output from a detailed optimisation model of a New Zealand dairy farm model (the Integrated Dairy Enterprise Analysis (IDEA) model) and output from FARMAX -a system-level model that farmers and consultants use to guide production decisions on New Zealand dairy farms (Bryant et al 2010). The FARMAX modelling is based on survey data obtained from farmers in the Waikato region, but provides an integrated set of data for comparison with output from the optimisation model (A. Adler, pers.…”
Section: Model Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%