2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.parint.2012.10.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Description and genetic characterisation of Hysterothylacium (Nematoda: Raphidascarididae) larvae parasitic in Australian marine fishes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
72
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
7
72
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, only 2 previous studies have reported genetic analyses of this genus from the Brazilian coast (Knoff et al, 2012;Borges et al, 2012). According to Shamsi et al (2013), the identification of the larval stages of this genus to the generic level using only morphological characters is difficult because there are several other genera having an intestinal caecum, ventricular appendix and an excretory pore at the level of the nerve ring, e.g., Paraheterotyphlum, Heterotyphlum, Iheringascaris and Lappetascaris. In the present study, the excretory pore was visible near the nerve ring, which also distinguishes it from Contracaecum (L3) (Moravec, 1998), and a molecular phylogenetic analysis showed the gene sequence similarity of the larvae collected for this study to the sequences of genus Hysterothylacium deposited in GenBank.…”
Section: Hysterothylacium Sp (L3) -Measurements Of Larvae Based On 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, only 2 previous studies have reported genetic analyses of this genus from the Brazilian coast (Knoff et al, 2012;Borges et al, 2012). According to Shamsi et al (2013), the identification of the larval stages of this genus to the generic level using only morphological characters is difficult because there are several other genera having an intestinal caecum, ventricular appendix and an excretory pore at the level of the nerve ring, e.g., Paraheterotyphlum, Heterotyphlum, Iheringascaris and Lappetascaris. In the present study, the excretory pore was visible near the nerve ring, which also distinguishes it from Contracaecum (L3) (Moravec, 1998), and a molecular phylogenetic analysis showed the gene sequence similarity of the larvae collected for this study to the sequences of genus Hysterothylacium deposited in GenBank.…”
Section: Hysterothylacium Sp (L3) -Measurements Of Larvae Based On 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also concluded that genetic characterization based nuclear and mitochondrial gene regions with sufficient phylogenetic signal should be conducted to obtain the true identification of the same larval stages of Hysterothylacium species from similar geographical areas and to explore the species diversity. In accordance to this inference Shamsi et al [16] also indicated that, even in the genetic characterization based on the ITS-1 and ITS-2 sequences of the same larval stage, some morphotypes could contain different genotypes.…”
Section: H Fabri Was Identified From Phycis Phycis Alosa Fallax Comentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Recent reports in Italy suggest that A. pegreffii can be the etiological agent of human infection (Mattiucci et al 2013). Genus Hysterothylacium Ward and Magath, 1917 is one of the common genera in the family Raphidascarididae (Fageholm 1991), in which there are approximately 70 species (Shamsi et al 2013). The adult stages are usually found in the alimentary canal of predatory teleost, while the L3 are found encapsulated in the mesentery and viscera of various species of marine teleosts and also in various marine invertebrates (Keskin et al 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The adult stages are usually found in the alimentary canal of predatory teleost, while the L3 are found encapsulated in the mesentery and viscera of various species of marine teleosts and also in various marine invertebrates (Keskin et al 2015). Thus, it is not host specific in the larval stages, exhibiting a global distribution (Shamsi et al 2013). Many species of the genus Hysterothylacium have been poorly described; thus, their genetic characteristics have been frequently deposited in Genbank without clear identification at the species level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%