2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10882-019-09698-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Description, Implementation Integrity, and Social Validity of a Computer-Assisted Sleep Monitoring System among Residential Care Providers of Students with Autism Spectrum Disorder

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hysteresis is optimized. When the detection of object status or parameter changes, the sensor technology can quickly grasp the state or parameter change information [ 8 ]. Sensor devices are mostly dependent on the wireless network arrangement, so it is not affected by the distribution of wired lines and has the advantage of flexible deployment and simple networking in the application [ 9 ].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hysteresis is optimized. When the detection of object status or parameter changes, the sensor technology can quickly grasp the state or parameter change information [ 8 ]. Sensor devices are mostly dependent on the wireless network arrangement, so it is not affected by the distribution of wired lines and has the advantage of flexible deployment and simple networking in the application [ 9 ].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Supervisors and program administrators received next-day reports and visual sleep charts of every student in order to evaluate trends, isolate problems, and recommend interventions if needed. Shlesinger et al (2020) documented average implementation integrity of the system at 91% among care providers over a 4-year period.…”
Section: Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social validity is fundamental to applied behavior analysis (Wolf, 1978) and has been assessed in sleep research through parent and care provider questionnaires with questions related to the acceptance, satisfaction, and helpfulness of interventions (Jin et al, 2013), asking whether they would recommend procedures to other practitioners (Shlesinger et al, 2020), and having them complete rating instruments such as the Treatment Acceptability Rating Form-Revised (McLay et al, 2019;Reimers et al, 1992) and Intervention Rating Profile-15 (Martens et al, 1985). Behavioral sleep assessment and treatment was well received and positively rated in this research although in some cases, care providers "perceived the interventions to require a great deal of effort and time to implement" (McLay et al, 2019, p. 14).…”
Section: Summary and Research-to-practice Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After being put to bed, an assigned care provider observed Donna in her bedroom for approximately 10 to 15 s every 30 min until a 7:00 a.m. wake-up time the next day. Using a computer-assisted sleep monitoring system developed at the residential school (Shlesinger et al, 2019), the care provider recorded whether Donna was sleeping or awake per 30-min observation by recording a respective sleep code via a password-protected application that was accessed on a desktop computer. The sleep monitoring system documented and stored the care provider recordings for all of the 30-min sleep observations scored during the night (bedtime through wake-up).…”
Section: Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%