Microbial desulfurization, or biodesulfurization (BDS), of fuels is a promising technology because it can desulfurize compounds that are recalcitrant to the current standard technology in the oil industry. One of the obstacles to the commercialization of BDS is the reduction in biocatalyst activity concomitant with the accumulation of the end product, 2-hydroxybiphenyl (HBP), during the process. BDS experiments were performed by incubating Rhodococcus erythropolis IGTS8 resting-cell suspensions with hexadecane at 0.50 (vol/vol) containing 10 mM dibenzothiophene. The resin Dowex Optipore SD-2 was added to the BDS experiments at resin concentrations of 0, 10, or 50 g resin/liter total volume. The HBP concentration within the cytoplasm was estimated to decrease from 1,100 to 260 M with increasing resin concentration. Despite this finding, productivity did not increase with the resin concentration. This led us to focus on the susceptibility of the desulfurization enzymes toward HBP. Dose-response experiments were performed to identify major inhibitory interactions in the most common BDS pathway, the 4S pathway. HBP was responsible for three of the four major inhibitory interactions identified. The concentrations of HBP that led to a 50% reduction in the enzymes' activities (IC 50 s) for DszA, DszB, and DszC were measured to be 60 ؎ 5 M, 110 ؎ 10 M, and 50 ؎ 5 M, respectively. The fact that the IC 50 s for HBP are all significantly lower than the cytoplasmic HBP concentration suggests that the inhibition of the desulfurization enzymes by HBP is responsible for the observed reduction in biocatalyst activity concomitant with HBP generation.
Biodesulfurization (BDS) is a process in which microorganisms, typically, bacteria, are used to reduce the level of sulfur in fuels derived from crude oil, including diesel and gasoline. Over the last 20 years, interest in BDS as an alternative to hydrodesulfurization (HDS), which is the current desulfurization standard in the oil industry, has increased. HDS uses a metal catalyst along with hydrogen gas (H 2 ) at high temperature and pressure to remove sulfur from organic sulfur compounds and generate H 2 S gas (1). Major drawbacks of HDS include steric hindrance of the metal catalysts by certain recalcitrant compounds and large energy consumption due to process operation at high temperature and pressure (1). Recalcitrant compounds include the parent molecule dibenzothiophene (DBT) and some of its alkylated derivatives, such as 4-methyldibenzothiophene (4-DBT) and 4,6-dimethyldibenzothiophene (4,6-DBT). BDS can potentially be used to remove the sulfur that cannot be removed by HDS, though it is likely not a replacement for the current HDS infrastructure. The use of more than one desulfurization technology may be necessary to meet the increasingly stringent sulfur regulations (1).There is a wide range of microorganisms known to have BDS capability (2). Such microorganisms typically desulfurize DBT by one of two pathways: the Kodama pathway or the 4S pathway (1). The Kodama pathway i...