2023
DOI: 10.18502/ijm.v15i4.13504
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Description of extraintestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli based on phylogenetic grouping, virulence factors, and antimicrobial susceptibility

Alfredo Montes-Robledo,
Yaleyvis Buelvas-Montes,
Rosa Baldiris-Avila

Abstract: Background and Objectives: Extraintestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli (ExPEC) is a recently recognized and highly diverse pathotype of E. coli. Its significance as a pathogen has increased due to the emergence of hypervirulent and multi- drug-resistant (MDR) strains. The aim of this study was to characterize ExPEC isolates from humans based on their phylo- genetic group, virulence factor profile, and antimicrobial susceptibility. Materials and Methods: The isolates were collected from patients with extr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 39 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As for phylogenetic grouping, it is described that both groups B2 and D primarily include strains with a higher pathogenic potential, while isolates from groups A and B1 are often regarded as commensals [18]. In this study, more than half (63%) of the isolates tested belonged to either group D or B2, revealing the importance of these falconry birds as vectors of E. coli strains with pathogenic potential.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…As for phylogenetic grouping, it is described that both groups B2 and D primarily include strains with a higher pathogenic potential, while isolates from groups A and B1 are often regarded as commensals [18]. In this study, more than half (63%) of the isolates tested belonged to either group D or B2, revealing the importance of these falconry birds as vectors of E. coli strains with pathogenic potential.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%