2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.livprodsci.2004.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Description of lamb growth using random regression on field data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

24
57
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
24
57
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Growth slowed over the rest of the trajectory. A similar pattern appeared in the data used by Fischer et al (2004), and mean values corresponded well with other Poll Dorset data at similar ages. Figure 2 also shows how measures of FD increased throughout the 300-day trajectory, with a sharper increase relative to BW and EMD around 200 days of age, which coincided with the slowing of growth.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Growth slowed over the rest of the trajectory. A similar pattern appeared in the data used by Fischer et al (2004), and mean values corresponded well with other Poll Dorset data at similar ages. Figure 2 also shows how measures of FD increased throughout the 300-day trajectory, with a sharper increase relative to BW and EMD around 200 days of age, which coincided with the slowing of growth.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Application of RR models to growth data is reasonably well documented in all major livestock industries (e.g. Fischer et al (2004), Huisman et al (2002), Meyer (2002) and Veerkamp and Thompson (1999)), however, they have not been applied to carcass composition data with the exception of Hassen et al (2003). In addition, multiple trait random regression (RR) models have been fitted between weight and other traits simultaneously (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traits in younger ages also differ from each other, especially at the lowest ages (for instance, the correlation between growth traits at 2 and 4 weeks is 0.70). In other studies, it has been shown that the genetic control of weight at initial ages is different from that observed at later ages (Fischer et al, 2004b;Wilson et al, 2005;Szwaczkowski et al, 2007;Costa et al, 2008;El Faro et al, 2008;Oliveira et al, 2010). The genetic correlations of BW measured between 14 and 24 weeks estimated with the multivariate method were 0.89 and 0.97 in US and UK turkey populations, respectively (Kranis et al, 2006).…”
Section: Correlationsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Huisman et al (2002) obtained better results with RR in comparison with the traditional multivariate model. Fischer et al (2004b) proposed that RR could be a good alternative to MT genetic analysis. Kranis et al (2007) compared genetic parameter estimates using RR and MT models for egg production in turkeys and concluded that both models were equally effective to describe the dynamics of genetic variance over time.…”
Section: Correlationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Test day models (TDM) have been receiving considerable attention from research studies on the genetic improvement of dairy cattle (Gengler et al, 1999;Kettunen et al, 2000;Schaeffer et al, 2000;Swalve, 2000;Misztal et al, 2000;Jensen, 2002;Lopez-Romero and Carabañ o, 2003;Mrode and Swanson, 2004;Fischer et al, 2004;Schaeffer, 2004;Albuquerque and Meyer, 2005). The use of TDM allows a more accurate definition of contemporary groups (CG) and associated environmental effects, thus offering a more specific definition of the effects of the lactation stage and reproduction of dairy cows.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%