2016
DOI: 10.1163/15685411-00003010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Description of Lelenchus brevislitus n. sp. (Nematoda: Tylenchidae), an example of a cryptic species from Iran and its phylogenetic relationships with other species in the family

Abstract: Lelenchus brevislitus n. sp. is described and illustrated based on morphological, morphometric and molecular data. The new species is characterised by having females with slender, 452-488 μm long, body lateral field vestigial as a plain simple band under scanning electron microscopy (SEM) in vulval region and absent in proximal and distal body ends, cephalic region short, ca 2 μm high, conical and truncate in anterior end in lateral view under SEM, dorso-ventrally flattened, amphidial pouches pocket-shaped and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many species are poorly described because of an overreliance on morphological characters using light microscopy (LM) and a limited number of specimens which has led to taxonomic confusion (Qing and Bert, 2018). Recently, molecular data have been used to improve taxonomic studies of the family members (Palomares-Rius et al, 2009;Bert et al, 2010;Atighi et al, 2013;Panahandeh et al, 2014Panahandeh et al, , 2015aPanahandeh et al, , 2015bPanahandeh et al, , 2016Panahandeh et al, , 2018Soleymanzadeh et al, 2016;Qing et al, 2016Qing et al, , 2017Pedram et al, 2018;Bert, 2017, 2018). Unfortunately, molecular data are often not available for all genera and species, and some genera are only rarely recovered after their original descriptions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many species are poorly described because of an overreliance on morphological characters using light microscopy (LM) and a limited number of specimens which has led to taxonomic confusion (Qing and Bert, 2018). Recently, molecular data have been used to improve taxonomic studies of the family members (Palomares-Rius et al, 2009;Bert et al, 2010;Atighi et al, 2013;Panahandeh et al, 2014Panahandeh et al, , 2015aPanahandeh et al, , 2015bPanahandeh et al, , 2016Panahandeh et al, , 2018Soleymanzadeh et al, 2016;Qing et al, 2016Qing et al, , 2017Pedram et al, 2018;Bert, 2017, 2018). Unfortunately, molecular data are often not available for all genera and species, and some genera are only rarely recovered after their original descriptions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During our extensive study of tylenchids in northern Iran (Panahandeh et al, 2014(Panahandeh et al, , 2015a(Panahandeh et al, , 2015b(Panahandeh et al, , 2016Soleymanzadeh et al, 2016;Mobasseri et al, 2017;Konani et al, 2018;Pedram et al, 2018), one population of the genus Labrys representing the second species of the genus was recovered from a soil sample of the natural forests in Gilan province. It is characterized using molecular and morphological characters and described herein as L. filiformis n. sp.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the BI tree (Figure ), the two isolates of the new species are strongly (BPP = 100) supported as a sister taxon of a clade formed by S. arboris (MF599082) + two species representing the genus Lelenchus viz. L. leptosoma (de Man, 1880) Andrássy, 1954, accession numbers , , and L. brevislitus Soleymanzadeh, Pedram, Pourjam, & Álvarez‐Ortega, 2016, accession number . On the other hand, in the ML tree (Figure ), the new species was supported (BS = 65%) as a sister taxon of S. arboris , and consequently representing the monophyly of the genus Sakia.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adequacy of the posterior sample size was evaluated using autocorrelation statistics as implemented in Tracer v.1.6 ( Rambaut and Drummond, 2009 ). Aphelenchid and neotylenchid outgroup taxa were used for SSU and LSU phylogenies, respectively, based on previous studies ( Yaghoubi et al., 2016 ; Soleymanzadeh et al, 2016 ; Pereira et al., 2017 ) (species names and accession numbers listed in corresponding trees). The output files of the phylogenetic programs used herein were visualized using Dendroscope v.3.2.8 ( Huson and Scornavacca, 2012 ) and re-drawn in CorelDRAW software version 2018.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%