2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2018.09.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Description of low back pain clinical trials in physical therapy: a cross sectional study

Abstract: Clinicians interested in low back pain trials must look for a wide variety of healthcare journals. A substantial number of low back pain randomized controlled trials did not follow adequate reporting and methodological recommendations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
6
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We strongly recommend the attention of researchers to perform the prospective register of study protocol (and to publish the protocol in peer-reviewed journals when possible), 38,39 to follow the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) guidelines when designing the trials, and the use of the TIDieR checklist (template for intervention description and replication) to confirm if all items required were reported in the manuscript before submission. 40,41 This is a way to reduce reporting bias and assist the authors to follow an adequate, clear, and transparent reporting of data and study design.…”
Section: Scientific Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We strongly recommend the attention of researchers to perform the prospective register of study protocol (and to publish the protocol in peer-reviewed journals when possible), 38,39 to follow the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) guidelines when designing the trials, and the use of the TIDieR checklist (template for intervention description and replication) to confirm if all items required were reported in the manuscript before submission. 40,41 This is a way to reduce reporting bias and assist the authors to follow an adequate, clear, and transparent reporting of data and study design.…”
Section: Scientific Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following data from the journals were extracted: 2020 journal impact factor (from the Web of Science, InCites Journal Citation Reports – Thomson Reuters’ website Clarivate Analytics) and categorized impact factor as more than 2, less than 2, and without impact factor; if the journal was open access (yes or no), obtained from the Directory of Open Access Journals, PubMed Central, or the journal’s website; and journals CONSORT endorsement (yes or no) [19], extracted from the CONSORT’s website or from the Instructions for authors areas of the journals [18].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data extraction was adapted from a previous study [18]. Two independent reviewers extracted the data in the form developed for this study.…”
Section: Data Extraction and Quality Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Um estudo prévio investigou a qualidade metodológica de estudos na área da fisioterapia, e encontrou que as subdisciplinas "musculoesquelética", "neurologia" e "geriatria" são, respectivamente, aquelas com estudos metodologicamente melhores 11 . Um outro estudo, realizado especificamente na subdisciplina "musculoesquelética", sobre dor lombar, reportou que as pesquisas apresentam qualidade metodológica moderada, estando esta característica relacionada ao fator de impacto das revistas nas quais são publicados 14 . Embora existam dados para a subdisciplina de neurologia, não existem dados específicos publicados para estudos especificamente sobre DA.…”
unclassified
“…Coeficiente de correlação de Spearman entre fator de impacto, qualidade metodológica e anos de publicação (n=93).Mais de 60% dos ensaios clínicos, na área de fisioterapia, na DA, foram publicados em jornais com fator de impacto maior que 2,0. O fator de impacto médio dos jornais foi de 6,7, o que significa que, são jornais com alto Embora os autores tenham encontrado correlação significativa entre as duas variáveis, esta foi classificada como fraca, tendo os autores concluído que, estudos com alta qualidade metodológica nem sempre se encontram publicados em jornais com maior fator de impacto14 .O principal ponto positivo deste estudo é a descrição do perfil de todos os ensaios clínicos publicados na base PEDro envolvendo a DA, apresentando um panorama geral das publicações. Além disso, 38 opções de jornais com fator de impacto considerável foram apresentadas, que publicam ensaios clínicos relacionados à reabilitação da condição neurológica.…”
unclassified