2019
DOI: 10.1099/ijsem.0.004707
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Description of Paenibacillus dokdonensis sp. nov., a new bacterium isolated from soil

Abstract: Two strains isolated from soil samples were designated as YH-JAE5T and YH-JAE2. The isolates were facultative anaerobic, Gram-stain-variable, motile, rod-shaped bacteria. Phylogenetic analysis indicated that the isolates belonged to the genus Paenibacillus , but the 16S rRNA gene sequence similarities were <98 % when compared with other species within the genus. Analysis of rpoB gene revealed the isolates formed a sub-clu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Alignment and phylogenetic analyses were performed using phylip and j phydit , respectively [12]. Three algorithms (maximum-likelihood, neighbour-joining and minimum-evolution) were used to reconstruct phylogenetic trees [13]. Bootstrap analysis was used to evaluate reliability [14] based on 1000 resamplings.…”
Section: Full-textmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Alignment and phylogenetic analyses were performed using phylip and j phydit , respectively [12]. Three algorithms (maximum-likelihood, neighbour-joining and minimum-evolution) were used to reconstruct phylogenetic trees [13]. Bootstrap analysis was used to evaluate reliability [14] based on 1000 resamplings.…”
Section: Full-textmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…lactis KCTC 3769 T was used as the outgroup. To differentiate the isolates, BOX-PCR fingerprinting was carried out as described previously [13].…”
Section: Full-textmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparison of the characteristics of strain KQZ6P-2 T and its phylogenetic neighbours Strains: 1, KQZ6P-2 T (data obtained from this study); 2, Paenibacillus chibensis CICC23908 T (data obtained from this study); 3, Paenibacillus dokdonensis YH-JAE5 T[42]; 4, Paenibacillus cookii LMG 18419 T[43]; 5, Paenibacillus azoreducens CM1 T[44]. +, Positive; −, negative; w, weakly positive; nd, no data obtained.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phylogenetic trees were reconstructed using unambiguous alignments. Alignments and phylogenetic analyses were performed using the phylip and jPHYDIT programs, respectively [11], and the neighbour-joining, maximum-likelihood and minimum-evolution algorithms were used to reconstruct phylogenetic trees [12]. Bootstrap analysis used 1000 re-samplings to evaluate the reliability of the phylogenetic trees.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%