2014
DOI: 10.2188/jea.je20130196
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Descriptive Epidemiology of Diabetes Prevalence and HbA1c Distributions Based on a Self-Reported Questionnaire and a Health Checkup in the JPHC Diabetes Study

Abstract: BackgroundThe present study examined the prevalence of diabetes in Japan during the late 1990s and early 2000s using the Japan Public Health Center-based Prospective Diabetes cohort. We also investigated the distributions of HbA1c values in noncompliant diabetic participants in the cohort.MethodsA total of 28 183 registered inhabitants aged 46–75 years from 10 public health center areas were included in the initial survey. The 5-year follow-up survey included 20 129 participants. The prevalence of diabetes was… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
1
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
10
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It could be speculated that the higher prevalence of diabetes or hypertension in the high consumption group might reflect an accurate diagnosis of individuals in these groups. According to our previous study,26 however, although the positive predictive value of self reported diabetes was 94% and specificity was 99% in our study, around 4% of participants were unaware of their diabetes status and did not answer that they had diabetes in the survey questionnaire but were identified by laboratory data 27. Thus, although people without self reported diabetes might be a cause of residual confounding, it is implausible that the prevalence of diabetes in each fifth of soy product intake influenced the mortality in our study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 58%
“…It could be speculated that the higher prevalence of diabetes or hypertension in the high consumption group might reflect an accurate diagnosis of individuals in these groups. According to our previous study,26 however, although the positive predictive value of self reported diabetes was 94% and specificity was 99% in our study, around 4% of participants were unaware of their diabetes status and did not answer that they had diabetes in the survey questionnaire but were identified by laboratory data 27. Thus, although people without self reported diabetes might be a cause of residual confounding, it is implausible that the prevalence of diabetes in each fifth of soy product intake influenced the mortality in our study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 58%
“…We excluded 481 (5.3%) patients with poor glycemic control at baseline and the prevalence after followup was about 2.0%. A previous cohort study found that the age-standardized prevalence of diabetes among Japanese adults aged 55–74 years was initially 8.2%, and 10.6% five years later 25 . Another study of Japanese adult men and women aged 20–69 years also found 8.0% and 3.3% prevalences of diabetes, respectively 26 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Ao verificar a resposta à pergunta Um médico ou outro profissional de saúde lhe disse que você tem alguma dessas doenças?, incluindo a DM, foi observada uma prevalência de DM referido de 18,5% (IC95%: 14,[9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]8). Verificou-se que entre os idosos que referiram a presença da doença, a maioria pertencia ao sexo feminino (74,6%), era do grupo etário 60 a 69 anos (50,7%), não apresentava companheiro (52,2%), pertencia ao nível socioeconômico C (53,7%) e residia com 4 a 5 pessoas no domicílio (43,3%) (Tabela 1).…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…Devido essa dificuldade, estudos nacionais 6-10 e internacionais [11][12][13][14][15] têm procurado indicadores simples que possam ser utilizados para a detec-ção da doença, como a morbidade referida. A detecção referida se caracteriza por uma resposta positiva ao diagnóstico prévio da doença, uma estratégia útil e de fácil execução que vem sendo utilizada como uma alternativa para estimar a prevalência em inquéritos de saúde 3,5 .…”
Section: Introductionunclassified