Desempenho, crescimento, qualidade do ovo, composição corporal e características reprodutivas e ósseas de poedeiras submetidas a diferentes programas nutricionais

Santos, A. L. F. dos

doi:10.11606/t.74.2008.tde-25032008-095634

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 19 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In support of the hypothesis of changes in the IP and IGR through diet manipulation, Santos (2008) reported an increase of 2 days in the IP for the Hy-Line Brown line when fed diets formulated to meet 95% of the nutritional requirements, compared with birds that consumed feed containing 105% of the requirements.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 88%

Application of non-linear mixed models for modelling the quail growth curve for meat and laying

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The objective of the current paper was to apply mixed models to adjust the growth curve of quail lines for meat and laying hens and present the rates of instantaneous, relative and absolute growth. A database was used with birth weight records up to the 148th day of female quail of the lines for meat and posture. The models evaluated were Brody, Von Bertalanffy, Logistic and Gompertz and the types of residues were constant, combined, proportional and exponential. The Gompertz model with the combined residue presented the best fit. Both strains present a high correlation between the parameters asymptotic weight (A) and average growth rate (k). The two strains presented a different growth profile. However, growth rates allow greater discernment of growth profiles. The meat line presented a higher growth rate (6.95 g/day) than the lineage for laying (3.65 g/day). The relative growth rate was higher for lineage for laying (0.15%) in relation to the lineage for meat (0.13%). The inflection point of both lines is on the first third of the growth curve (up to 15 days). All results suggest that changes in management or nutrition could optimize quail production.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 88%