2023
DOI: 10.1007/s10892-023-09427-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Desert Retributivism: A Deweyan Critique

Abstract: In this article, I argue that Michael Moore’s (1997), and other similar formulations of desert retributivism – viz., the theory that holds punishment to be justified because of the deserved suffering it imposes on guilty offenders – are epistemically problematic. The argument draws on John Dewey’s inchoate critique of retribution, and on Dewey’s more general contention that the justification of ethical judgments and principles proceeds ex post – viz., that it depends on the experiences elicited by acting on th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
0
0

Publication Types

Select...

Relationship

0
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 0 publications
references
References 35 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance

No citations

Set email alert for when this publication receives citations?