1998
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1634558
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Desiderata for Controlled Medical Vocabularies in the Twenty-First Century

Abstract: Builders of medical informatics applications need controlled medical vocabularies to support their applications and it is to their advantage to use available standards. In order to do so, however, these standards need to address the requirements of their intended users. Overthe past decade, medical informatics researchers have begun to articulate some of these requirements. This paper brings together some of the common themes which have been described, including: vocabulary content, concept orientation, concep… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
352
0
17

Year Published

1999
1999
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 403 publications
(370 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(33 reference statements)
1
352
0
17
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of free text was not feasible because of length restrictions for the automated form fields, the high likelihood of spelling errors on forms or scanning errors due to multiple handwriting sources and multiple languages. Given the need for a alphanumeric code for each medication, the ideal standard should adhere to best-practice criteria [20] regarding the management of numerical codes. The codes should be non-sensical, unique, non-ambiguous, permanent, and should never be recycled to encode other concepts.…”
Section: Types Of Data Collected and Operating Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The use of free text was not feasible because of length restrictions for the automated form fields, the high likelihood of spelling errors on forms or scanning errors due to multiple handwriting sources and multiple languages. Given the need for a alphanumeric code for each medication, the ideal standard should adhere to best-practice criteria [20] regarding the management of numerical codes. The codes should be non-sensical, unique, non-ambiguous, permanent, and should never be recycled to encode other concepts.…”
Section: Types Of Data Collected and Operating Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While it is not international in mission, the NLM does strive to address international needs in all of its activities, and as a rule ensures free and global access to its products. The library guarantees "best" terminology practices [20], and the numerical codes in RxNorm will never be changed or reassigned. These code numbers are easily accessible through the NLM-developed UMLS and the RxNav [38] interfaces.…”
Section: Standard Rationale and Implementation -Rxnorm For Medicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From this base a number of key papers have been developed, many within the framework of the biannual IMIA Working Group 6 meetings, including Cimino's well known paper on Desiderata for clinical systems [25] and Campbell's work on representing SNOMED in Conceptual Graphs and later in description logic [19][20][21] which eventually gave rise to SNOMED-RT [119]. In the meantime the Read Codes in the UK was undergoing metamorphosis into the Clinical Terms version 3 (CTv3) which provided explicit decompositions but without formal foundations.…”
Section: Terminology and The 'Terminology Wars'mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the sequel we restrict to the medical domain, which is sufficiently rich to present all types of terminology systems. The following authors [5,6] [7,8] [9] give a summary of different medical terminology systems and discuss the features of these systems with regard to requirements for concept taxonomies. For our objective to construct an ontologically founded context-sensitive data dictionary -in the first step it was necessary to analyze medical terminology systems with regard to reusability for the construction of a context-sensitive data dictionary model.…”
Section: Terminology Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%