Design allowables of composite laminates: A review

Abstract

The design and certification process of composite structures relies on the building-block approach, which starts from the mechanical characterization of the material at coupon-level. The certification of composite laminates is thus the first challenge and requires the definition of the design allowables, which are statistically defined as established by the Composite Material Handbook. These quantities are strength or strain values indicated as A- or B-basis and an accurate estimation is needed in order to guarantee the integrity of the structure. Given the statistical nature of material allowables, a high number of experimental tests have to be performed for the full mechanical characterization of a material. Notched and unnotched allowables are determined under different testing conditions and in accordance to the standards specified by American Society for Testing and Materials. Different methodologies are presented in literature and explore the combination of simulation-based solutions supported by test-evidence of a reduced number of coupons. In the recent years, several approaches have been explored in the field of uncertainty quantification and Machine Learning demonstrating to be powerful alternatives to full testing-based or simulation-based solutions. A comprehensive literature review is presented in this contribution among the main solutions for the definition of material allowables. This review demonstrates that simulations supported by a reduced number of tests can reach accurate results and the number of simulations can be further reduced by combining the numerical models with predicting theories.

Application Research on the Lightweight Design and Optimization of Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymers (CFRP) Floor for Automobile

“…The mechanical analysis of anisotropic and isotropic materials has the same equilibrium equations, geometric equations, coordination equations, and boundary conditions, and the main difference is that the constitutive equations of stress and strain are different. When analyzing the mechanical properties of composites, the following conditions are often assumed to hold [ 41 , 42 , 43 ]: (1) Assume that the laminate is continuous; (2) Assumed that the unidirectional laminates are homogeneous; (3) Assumed that the unidirectional laminates are orthotropic anisotropic; (4) Assume that the laminates are linearly elastic; and (5) Assumed that the deformation of laminate is very small.…”

Multiscale Modelling and Characterization of Bonded Repaired Sandwich Composite Facing Sheet under Static Loading

“…This dictates the need for failure characterization at all three length scales namely: micro, meso and macro scales respectively [9]. FEA models are usually too simple to characterize failure at all three-length scales and experimental testing on its own can also be prohibitively expensive [10].…”

Enhanced Reverse-Engineering Method for Accurately Predicting Lamina Properties in Laminated Composites via Combined Static and Dynamic Finite Element Simulations

“…Applying traditional reverse-design methods to composites, which are inherently anisotropic and vary in their material elastic modulus, layer thickness, lamination angle, and stacking sequence, presents significant challenges [10]. The accurate analysis of materials in laminated composites requires iterative experimental procedures, such as cyclic load tests, cross-sectional evaluations, and fiber volume ratio assessments.…”