Proceedings of the Sixth ACM International Workshop on VehiculAr InterNETworking 2009
DOI: 10.1145/1614269.1614285
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design and analysis of a lightweight certificate revocation mechanism for VANET

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
46
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, although trust and security protocols can be used to ensure that the vehicles cooperate and are accountable for the information that they share (e.g., [18], [19], [20], [21], [22]), we were also interested in identifying what is the impact of misbehaving nodes on the traffic conditions. In our scenario, misbehaving nodes are nodes that intentionally spread wrong information about a pre-agreed selection of road segments.…”
Section: Studying the Impact Of Misbehaving Nodesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, although trust and security protocols can be used to ensure that the vehicles cooperate and are accountable for the information that they share (e.g., [18], [19], [20], [21], [22]), we were also interested in identifying what is the impact of misbehaving nodes on the traffic conditions. In our scenario, misbehaving nodes are nodes that intentionally spread wrong information about a pre-agreed selection of road segments.…”
Section: Studying the Impact Of Misbehaving Nodesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous trust mechanisms were also devised [18], [19], [20] to improve cooperation and quality of the disseminated information. Finally, security mechanisms [21], [22] can also be enforced to ensure safety and privacy. All these systems are orthogonal to our approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This equates to about 43,800 pseudonyms per year for an average of two hours of driving per day [21]. Haas, Hu, and Laberteaux in [11] recommend changing pseudonyms every 10 minutes, and driving 15 hours per week. This equates to 4,660 pseudonyms per year, but they recommend storing five years of pseudonyms for a total of about 25,000 pseudonyms per OBU.…”
Section: Query Cost Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RL management still has many open issues and challenges to be resolved. Rrecent revocation-related studies can be adapted to complement the ESPR scheme, e.g., [37], [38], and [35].…”
Section: Trust Revocationmentioning
confidence: 99%