2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.aeue.2021.153880
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design and analysis of a compact circularly polarized DRA for off-body communications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, the measured AR < 3 dB bandwidth is 7.2% (27.9-30.1 GHz). Similarly, the simulated and measured 3 dB gain bandwidth is 16.9% (27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32).…”
Section: Experimental and Simulated Ar Gain And Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 77%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Also, the measured AR < 3 dB bandwidth is 7.2% (27.9-30.1 GHz). Similarly, the simulated and measured 3 dB gain bandwidth is 16.9% (27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32).…”
Section: Experimental and Simulated Ar Gain And Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The comparison of the explained antenna model is summarized in Table 1 with already proposed lens-loaded antennas [21][22][23][24]29,30 and simple DRAs. 9,31 The proposed antenna characteristics in terms of volume, frequency range, antenna type gain, efficiency and polarization sense are compared with published models. The proposed antennas in 22,32 provided a high gain of 15.1 and 12.2 dBi, respectively.…”
Section: Comparison With Already Proposed Antennasmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly, the lower-end cutoff frequency shifted from 4.1 GHz to 4.3 GHz. Meher et al have developed a compact and circularly polarized monopole antenna with a slightly bent perpendicular ground plane and a dielectric resonator parallel to the monopole in their recent work [64]. This antenna showed an axial ratio bandwidth of 6.22 GHz to 7.33 GHz for free air, 6.21 GHz to 7.22 GHz on the body, and 6.20 GHz to 7.28 GHz on the phantom.…”
Section: B Circularly Polarized Antennamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to balance the trade-offs [7], microwave antennas are the top-most priority. They are classified as dipole antennas [18][19][20][21], monopole antennas [22][23][24][25], loop antennas [26][27][28][29], slot antennas [30][31][32][33], microstrip antennas [34][35][36][37], Vivaldi antennas [38][39][40][41], and DRAs [42][43][44][45]. Further, the classification is divided into helical antennas [46][47][48][49], Yagi-Uda antennas [50][51][52][53], and log-periodic antennas [54][55][56][57].…”
Section: Reconfigurable Antennas and Their Usage In Rf Energy Harvest...mentioning
confidence: 99%