While link prediction methods in knowledge graphs have been increasingly utilized to locate potential associations between compounds and diseases, they suffer from lack of sufficient evidence to prove why a drug and a disease may be indicated. This is especially true for knowledge graph embedding (KGE) based methods where a drug-disease indication is linked only by information gleaned from a vector representation. Complementary pathwalking algorithms can increase the confidence of drug repositioning candidates by traversing a knowledge graph. However, these methods heavily weigh the relatedness of drugs, through their targets, pharmacology or shared diseases. Furthermore, these methods rely on arbitrarily extracted paths as evidence of a compound to disease indication and lack the ability to make predictions on rare diseases. In this paper, we evaluate seven link prediction methods on a large biomedical knowledge graph on a drug repositioning task. We follow the principle of consilience, and combine the reasoning paths and predictions provided by probabilistic case-based reasoning (probCBR) with those of a KGE method, TransE, to identify putative drug repositioning indications. Finally, we highlight the utility of our approach through two potential repurposing indications.