2014
DOI: 10.1177/1040638713516758
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design and application of a loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay for the rapid detection of Staphylococcus pseudintermedius

Abstract: Abstract. Staphylococcus pseudintermedius is a commensal and opportunistic pathogen of dogs. It is mainly implicated in canine pyoderma, as well as other suppurative conditions of dogs. Although bacterial culture is routinely used for clinical diagnosis, molecular methods are required to accurately identify and differentiate S. pseudintermedius from other members of the Staphylococcus intermedius group. These methods, owing largely to their cost, are not easy to implement in nonspecialized laboratories or vete… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Since this analytical method is still mainly used in research laboratories, new approaches are being investigated to make it practical, such as developing a portable detection prototype based on Arduino, an open electronics micro controller board [81]. Currently, LAMP is more accurate than quantitative-PCR for the detection of meningococcal infections in children [82], gene doping therapies [83], peanut allergens in processed food [84], acute viral necrobiotic infections in scallops [85], and Staphylococcus pseudintermedius bacterial infections in canines [86].…”
Section: Loop-mediated Isothermal Amplification (Lamp)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since this analytical method is still mainly used in research laboratories, new approaches are being investigated to make it practical, such as developing a portable detection prototype based on Arduino, an open electronics micro controller board [81]. Currently, LAMP is more accurate than quantitative-PCR for the detection of meningococcal infections in children [82], gene doping therapies [83], peanut allergens in processed food [84], acute viral necrobiotic infections in scallops [85], and Staphylococcus pseudintermedius bacterial infections in canines [86].…”
Section: Loop-mediated Isothermal Amplification (Lamp)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The efficiency and speed of LAMP technology means that tests can detect STEC infections and provide information on, for example, AMR profiles, in <15 min, directly from a swab, with excellent specificity and sensitivity (Diribe, Thomas, AbuOun, Fitzpatrick, & La Ragione, ; Diribe et al., ).…”
Section: Rapid Detection and Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent advances in genome sequencing technology enable primers to be designed on pan‐genomes generated from multiple strains, thus increasing specificity. LAMP can detect between 5 and 10 organisms in a swab sample and is therefore considered to have superior sensitivity to culture or PCR‐based diagnostics (Diribe et al., ; La Ragione, R.M., personal communication). LAMP assays have been designed on a number of targets, including rfbe for Enterohemorrhage E. coli, Z3276 gene for the detection of E. coli O157:H7 and stx1 with stx2 for Shiga toxins.…”
Section: Rapid Detection and Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LAMP is a single-step nucleic acid amplification technique that is rapid, sensitive, and cost-effective. This technique can amplify a few copies of DNA into billions of copies within 30 min ( Notomi et al, 2000 ; Diribe et al, 2014 ) and has been used to detect a wide range of viral, bacterial, and parasitic pathogens ( Wong Y.-P. et al, 2018 ; Li et al, 2019 ; Tian et al, 2019 ; Vergara et al, 2020 ). LAMP is less sensitive to PCR inhibitors in poorly or nonprocessed samples, such as blood, sputum, and urine, making it suitable for use as a point-of-care diagnostic ( Notomi et al, 2000 ; Nagamine et al, 2002 ; Kaneko et al, 2005 ; Parida et al, 2008 ; Francois et al, 2011 ; Dhama et al, 2014 ; Gadkar et al, 2018 ; Moehling et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%