2007
DOI: 10.1002/elps.200700149
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design and applications of coupled SPE‐CE

Abstract: CE suffers from an inherent low concentration sensitivity. Analyte detection limits can be improved by combining CE with SPE. This paper presents an overview of coupled SPE-CE systems that have been reported in literature. Attention is paid to fundamental aspects of coupling SPE and CE, as well as to important SPE requirements. Interfaces for inline and online coupling with CE are critically discussed, and their mode of operation is outlined. Advantages and limitations of the interfaces are discussed and typic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
54
0
4

Year Published

2009
2009
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 176 publications
0
54
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, as the SPE column is physically separated from the CE capillary in the on-line system, this allows for independent operation and optimization of the SPE and the CE. [2][3][4][5][6] On-line coupling of SPE with CE requires a specially designed interface. In addition to implementation of electric connection for CE, the interface should have the ability to exactly transfer nanoliters of fractions from SPE onto CE with minimized degradation of the efficiencies of SPE and CE.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, as the SPE column is physically separated from the CE capillary in the on-line system, this allows for independent operation and optimization of the SPE and the CE. [2][3][4][5][6] On-line coupling of SPE with CE requires a specially designed interface. In addition to implementation of electric connection for CE, the interface should have the ability to exactly transfer nanoliters of fractions from SPE onto CE with minimized degradation of the efficiencies of SPE and CE.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome this limitation, improvements in UV detection were proposed using longer optical path lengths with a Z-/ U-shaped or a bubble detection cell. More sensitive detection methods, such as laser-induced fluorescence or mass spectrometry are also frequently used [2,3]. Alternative strategies consist in preconcentrating the analyte before CE separation, either by electrophoretic stacking or by solid-phase extraction (SPE) [3][4][5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More sensitive detection methods, such as laser-induced fluorescence or mass spectrometry are also frequently used [2,3]. Alternative strategies consist in preconcentrating the analyte before CE separation, either by electrophoretic stacking or by solid-phase extraction (SPE) [3][4][5]. In stacking methods, the volume of the sample must be lower than the total capillary volume [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although attomole limits of detection has been reported in CE-ESI-MS applications [3], the concentration detection limit of CE-ESI-MS is still poor because the volume that can be injected to CE is very limited [4]. To improve the concentration detection limit, various preconcentration approaches have been proposed [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. In electrophoresis-based methods [5][6][7], which utilize a stacking technique, preconcentration occurs in the separation capillary.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%