2022
DOI: 10.3390/mi13020252
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design and Characterization of a Microfluidic Circuit for Air Particulate Matter Separation

Abstract: Air microfluidic circuits have been widely concerned in the separation of atmospheric particulate matter, especially for portable particulate matter separation detection devices. Currently, no systematic approach for the design and optimization of an air-microfluidic system for PM separation has been reported in the literature. In this paper, a two-stage air microfluidic circuit is designed. The design process is divided into two stages: first, the preliminary design of the structure is completed according to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To achieve PM 2.5 mass detection, it is critical to separate them from ambient air. There are several methods to develop for PM 2.5 classification, including thermal precipitation, gravitational sedimentation, centrifugation, and inertial separation. , The virtual impactor (VI), which is one kind of inertial separator, has been widely used for PM 2.5 sampling due to its compact size and good collection efficiency. The principle of using a VI to separate particles is that when the airflow passes through the flow channel, the carried particles with a smaller aerodynamic diameter are more likely to flow along the streamline, which makes it possible to separate them according to their sizes. One key performance indicator of VI is the cutoff diameter, defined as the particle aerodynamic diameter that has a collection efficiency of 50% in major flow channels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To achieve PM 2.5 mass detection, it is critical to separate them from ambient air. There are several methods to develop for PM 2.5 classification, including thermal precipitation, gravitational sedimentation, centrifugation, and inertial separation. , The virtual impactor (VI), which is one kind of inertial separator, has been widely used for PM 2.5 sampling due to its compact size and good collection efficiency. The principle of using a VI to separate particles is that when the airflow passes through the flow channel, the carried particles with a smaller aerodynamic diameter are more likely to flow along the streamline, which makes it possible to separate them according to their sizes. One key performance indicator of VI is the cutoff diameter, defined as the particle aerodynamic diameter that has a collection efficiency of 50% in major flow channels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ning Xue et al designed a two-stage PM air-microfluidic graded chip with cutoff diameters of 10 µm and 2.5 µm based on COMSOL numerical simulations, and numerically analyzed the virtual impactor parameters [ 21 ]. In 2022, Jianhai Sun et al designed a two-stage air microfluidic circuit and explored the effects of various factors on collection efficiency and wall loss through numerical simulations, optimizing the design of the microfluidic circuit structure [ 22 ]. Most studies on virtual impactors affect the cutoff diameter and wall loss of virtual impactors by changing the size of the virtual impactor or the inlet flow rate; however, few studies have investigated the effect of fluid dynamic viscosity on the cutoff diameter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inertial impingers include conventional impingers, cascade impingers and virtual impingers, among which virtual impingers are widely used due to low particle loss. Virtual impactor is a device to achieve particle separation according to particle size, and is widely used in the field of particle measurement [3]. The main methods of particle mass concentration measurement are β-ray method, TEOM method and light scattering method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%