2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.sna.2020.112087
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design and characterization of a MEMS piezoelectric acoustic sensor with the enhanced signal-to-noise ratio

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The signal-to-noise ratio and location distance are improved. Rahaman et al [80] used AlN and D33 as piezoelectric sensors, which have the characteristics of high signal-to-noise ratio, high sensitivity, low noise, and linearity; Arumbu et al [81] established the secondorder quadratic model of acoustic Doppler velocimeter to measure the acoustic signal, which represents the continuous model of signal-to-noise ratio and determines the optimal acoustic receiving area. (5) The non-contact pipe excitation approach to radiate the sound wave into the pipeline has been studied.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The signal-to-noise ratio and location distance are improved. Rahaman et al [80] used AlN and D33 as piezoelectric sensors, which have the characteristics of high signal-to-noise ratio, high sensitivity, low noise, and linearity; Arumbu et al [81] established the secondorder quadratic model of acoustic Doppler velocimeter to measure the acoustic signal, which represents the continuous model of signal-to-noise ratio and determines the optimal acoustic receiving area. (5) The non-contact pipe excitation approach to radiate the sound wave into the pipeline has been studied.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…They can achieve accurate directional response relying on many different techniques and configurations and appropriate signal processing schemes [ 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 ]. More recently, the reduced size, lightweight, and lower power requirements of MEMS-based directional acoustic sensors fostered interest in their development [ 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 ]. Furthermore, the possibility of sound source localization by deploying a set of networked sensors make them even more attractive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the possibility of sound source localization by deploying a set of networked sensors make them even more attractive. Most of the MEMS directional sensor designs are based on the configuration of the hearing mechanism of the Ormia ochracea fly [ 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 ]. The fly’s hearing organ evolved to employ unique mechanically coupled eardrums that results in remarkable directional sound sensitivity, regardless of their small subwavelength eardrum separation [ 39 , 40 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, many researchers have studied MEMS microphones because of their great performance, such as high sensitivities, low power consumption, suitable frequency responses, stability, and reliability, and several MEMS microphones have been developed including capacitance type [2][3][4][5], piezoelectric type [6][7][8][9] and piezoresistive type [10][11][12]. For example, Ganji et al [4] reported a MEMS capacitive microphone using a perforated diaphragm supported by Z-shape arms with a high open sensitivity of 2.46 mV/Pa, and a small size of 0.3 mm × 0.3 mm; Segovia-Fernandez et al [6] reported a MEMS piezoelectric acoustic sensor with a sensitivity of 0.68 mV/Pa; Rahaman et al [7] reported a MEMS piezoelectric acoustic sensor with very high signal-to-noise ratio; Lhermet et al [10] first reported a piezoresistive microphone based on an in-plane deflecting micro-diaphragm and piezoresistive nano-gauges with a small size and high sensitivity of 0.1 mV/Pa. Although those microphones fit well with MEMS technology and provide a good performance, the capacitive microphone has the problem that the capacitive plate is easy to absorb and adhere to [2], and the piezoelectric microphone has the problems of poor anti-interference ability and low signal-to-noise ratio, and the piezoresistive microphone has the problem of low sensitivity [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…small size of 0.3 mm × 0.3 mm; Segovia-Fernandez et al [6] reported a MEMS piezoelectric acoustic sensor with a sensitivity of 0.68 mV/Pa; Rahaman et al [7] reported a MEMS piezoelectric acoustic sensor with very high signal-to-noise ratio; Lhermet et al [10] first reported a piezoresistive microphone based on an in-plane deflecting micro-diaphragm and piezoresistive nano-gauges with a small size and high sensitivity of 0.1 mV/Pa. Although those microphones fit well with MEMS technology and provide a good performance, the capacitive microphone has the problem that the capacitive plate is easy to absorb and adhere to [2], and the piezoelectric microphone has the problems of poor antiinterference ability and low signal-to-noise ratio, and the piezoresistive microphone has the problem of low sensitivity [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%