“…Indeed, the peak is larger than the expected variation in background in this field range. If we interpret the data in this way then, assuming linear variation of A ( t =0) either side of the crossing, we estimate this occurs with a centre at B
cross =3.73(5) T. Since we expect a minimum in the asymmetry as a function of the applied field, in correspondence of the level crossing,22 superimposing this minimum on the increase in A ( t ) caused by the field‐dependent change in α would then result in the behaviour we observe. Assuming this model, then a subtraction of an estimated background contribution (grey line, bottom‐right inset, Figure 9) leads to the resonance shown in the upper panel of the right inset, Figure 9, which has a full width half maximum of around 0.5 T. The precise width of a resonance derived in this way is highly dependent on the model used to fit the background, but is generally much larger than that expected for a pure level crossing involving states of different symmetries.…”