2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.mhpa.2010.09.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design and conduct of a pragmatic randomized controlled trial to enhance smoking-cessation outcomes with exercise: The Fit2Quit study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Full details of the design and conduct of the Fit2Quit trial have been published elsewhere [17]. In brief, a parallel two-arm randomized controlled trial was conducted in New Zealand between 2009 and 2012.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Full details of the design and conduct of the Fit2Quit trial have been published elsewhere [17]. In brief, a parallel two-arm randomized controlled trial was conducted in New Zealand between 2009 and 2012.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The full details of the design and conduct of the Fit2Quit trial have been published elsewhere [4]. In brief, it was a parallel group two-arm randomised controlled trial conducted in New Zealand (NZ) between 2009 and 2012.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, consistent with other similarly complex physical activity randomized clinical trials that publish baseline data and methods (e.g. Bock et al, 2010; Brown et al, 2009; Jung et al, 2010; Maddison et al, 2010; Marcus et al, 1997; 2007b), the purpose of this paper is to present the design, methods, and baseline data from the Colorado STRIDE (COSTRIDE) intervention trial in order to illustrate how theory-based individual difference variables can be integrated into a randomized controlled exercise intervention trial. Specifically, we will (1) describe the study and rationale of COSTRIDE; (2) describe our sample; and (3) provide a preliminary examination of the relationships between variables at baseline.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%