2010 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium 2010
DOI: 10.1109/ultsym.2010.5935751
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design and construction of a passive receiver array for monitoring transcranial focused ultrasound therapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If one can take this and the skull-induced effects into account, the strength of the emissions at each point can be estimated and potentially related to the resulting FUS-induced effects – the strength of the BBB disruption for example (Arvanitis et al , 2012). Ultimately, one could redesign the MRgFUS device with passive imaging in mind, with receivers embedded throughout the hemisphere transducer to create three-dimensional cavitation maps (O'Reilly et al , 2010). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If one can take this and the skull-induced effects into account, the strength of the emissions at each point can be estimated and potentially related to the resulting FUS-induced effects – the strength of the BBB disruption for example (Arvanitis et al , 2012). Ultimately, one could redesign the MRgFUS device with passive imaging in mind, with receivers embedded throughout the hemisphere transducer to create three-dimensional cavitation maps (O'Reilly et al , 2010). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, the only clinically-relevant method to monitor cavitation activity with high sensitivity and specificity, and at the same time provide information about the mode and strength of the oscillations in real-time, is with acoustic methods – in particular with passive cavitation mapping (Norton and Won, 2000; Gyongy and Coussios, 2010b; Haworth et al , 2012; O'Reilly et al , 2010). This technique uses the FUS device as a source and an array of receivers to passively record and reconstruct the acoustic field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus monitoring of acoustic emissions during treatment to track treatment progress and safety would be very easy to implement in patients. In the future, more complex monitoring could be achieved by implementing multiple receivers and performing passive beamforming to map the cavitation activity during treatment [80, 81]. …”
Section: Treatment Safety and Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Passive imaging methods that can map cavitation activity synchronously to the treatment have also been developed [References!]. They have great potential for monitoring cavitation-based FUS therapies , as they do not interfere with the treatment [Gyongy and Coussios, 2010], they can be used to isolate the specific type of oscillation [Haworth et al, 2012], and they can potentially be more accurate than active imaging approaches when sonicating behind highly aberrating media such as the skull [O'Reilly et al, 2010], since the pressure wave only passes once through the aberrating media. Real-time mapping of cavitation activity holds great promise for translating acoustic cavitation induced therapeutic effects to clinical practice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%