1979
DOI: 10.1007/bf01710457
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design and construction of territories subjected to karst-piping processes in Moscow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several terms have been used in the literature to classify this seepage erosion. For instance "heave" (a substantial soil volume which is simultaneously raised by seepage flow, Terzaghi [22]), "karst-piping" (the removal of material due to weathering) [23], "hydraulic fracturing" (the process of soil being locally pushed apart by pore water pressures) [24], and the "internal erosion" (the transport of small particles through a matrix of larger ones [25,26]. the bimsoil piping phenomenon has been studied by several scholars [37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44], the study of the piping evolution process of bimsoil in laboratory test is mostly based on conventional penetration testing (e.g., constant head test) [37,38], and it is difficult to precisely control the seepage hydraulic pressure and hydraulic gradient.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several terms have been used in the literature to classify this seepage erosion. For instance "heave" (a substantial soil volume which is simultaneously raised by seepage flow, Terzaghi [22]), "karst-piping" (the removal of material due to weathering) [23], "hydraulic fracturing" (the process of soil being locally pushed apart by pore water pressures) [24], and the "internal erosion" (the transport of small particles through a matrix of larger ones [25,26]. the bimsoil piping phenomenon has been studied by several scholars [37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44], the study of the piping evolution process of bimsoil in laboratory test is mostly based on conventional penetration testing (e.g., constant head test) [37,38], and it is difficult to precisely control the seepage hydraulic pressure and hydraulic gradient.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%