2021
DOI: 10.1109/access.2021.3136242
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design and Control of a Reconfigurable Upper Limb Rehabilitation Exoskeleton With Soft Modular Joints

Abstract: Upper limb rehabilitation robot can effectively help patients recover motor ability. Existing rehabilitation robots are usually driven by rigid motors and the mechanical structures cannot adapt to the different patients with the different physical parameters and different rehabilitation needs. This paper designs a reconfigurable upper limb rehabilitation exoskeleton for elbow and wrist joints driven by pneumatic muscle actuators (PMAs). The exoskeleton can assist patients to achieve elbow flexion/extension, wr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the control methods which have been applied to pneumatic robots, one can distinguish differential geometric approaches (Lie algebra-based control, differential flatness theory-based control, nonlinear model predictive control [NMPC], sliding-mode control, backstepping control and multiple models-based fuzzy control) (Tuvayonond and Parnichkun, 2017; Pfeffer et al , 2018; Best et al , 2016). Treating nonlinearities and fault tolerance issues in the control problem of robotic manipulators with electropneumatic actuators has been a nontrivial task (Tanaka et al , 2021; Liang et al , 2022; Ho et al , 2021; Gao et al , 2021; Liu et al , 2021). There is ongoing research on advanced control methods for electropneumatic robots and some remarkable results can be found in Tahoumi et al (2021), Bone et al (2015), Bouri and Thomasset (2001), Ameur et al (2016) and Michel et al (2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the control methods which have been applied to pneumatic robots, one can distinguish differential geometric approaches (Lie algebra-based control, differential flatness theory-based control, nonlinear model predictive control [NMPC], sliding-mode control, backstepping control and multiple models-based fuzzy control) (Tuvayonond and Parnichkun, 2017; Pfeffer et al , 2018; Best et al , 2016). Treating nonlinearities and fault tolerance issues in the control problem of robotic manipulators with electropneumatic actuators has been a nontrivial task (Tanaka et al , 2021; Liang et al , 2022; Ho et al , 2021; Gao et al , 2021; Liu et al , 2021). There is ongoing research on advanced control methods for electropneumatic robots and some remarkable results can be found in Tahoumi et al (2021), Bone et al (2015), Bouri and Thomasset (2001), Ameur et al (2016) and Michel et al (2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%