2017 IEEE 8th Control and System Graduate Research Colloquium (ICSGRC) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/icsgrc.2017.8070577
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design and development of infrared turbidity sensor for Aluminium Sulfate coagulant process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous work has tested the utility of near-IR diode emitters and receivers as turbidity sensors. Adzuan et al (2017) utilized one emitter with three receivers (mounted at 90 • or 180 • angles from the emitter) to measure Aluminum Sulfate coagulants (commonly used in water treatment processes). This sensor yielded a linear response spanning less than 0.2 V for turbidities of 0-100 NTU, and a linear response with different slope spanning approximately 0.1V for turbidities of 200-1000 NTU.…”
Section: Existing Open-source Turbidity Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous work has tested the utility of near-IR diode emitters and receivers as turbidity sensors. Adzuan et al (2017) utilized one emitter with three receivers (mounted at 90 • or 180 • angles from the emitter) to measure Aluminum Sulfate coagulants (commonly used in water treatment processes). This sensor yielded a linear response spanning less than 0.2 V for turbidities of 0-100 NTU, and a linear response with different slope spanning approximately 0.1V for turbidities of 200-1000 NTU.…”
Section: Existing Open-source Turbidity Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous work has tested the utility of near-IR diode emitters and receivers as turbidity sensors. Adzuan et al (2017) utilized one emitter with three receivers (mounted at 90 or 180 angles from the emitter) to measure aluminum sulfate coagulants (commonly used in water treatment processes). This sensor yielded a linear response spanning less than 0.2 V for turbidities of 0-100 NTU, and a linear response with different slope spanning $ 0.1 V for turbidities of 200-1000 NTU.…”
Section: Existing Open-source Turbidity Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although these developments demonstrated good correlation between the measured results and the reference turbidity readings, many of them exhibit limitations when it comes to meeting the requirements for in situ, field monitoring applications. Several designs lack robust waterproof enclosures, making them unsuitable for practical field deployments [28,31,34,37,38,41]. For instance, Wang et al (2018) designed a turbidity sensor for fresh water monitoring [41], but the device is primarily an experimental setup involving connected electrical components without a waterproof enclosure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these sensors impose constraints such as channelling the water through a specific tubing or extracting water into a chamber or container. For example, Azman et al (2017) required water to be passed through a pipe to enable accurate measurements, thus imposing tight constraints on the scenarios where this sensor can be used [30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation