2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.05.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design and evaluation of a prototype of augmented reality applied to medical devices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…SPSS23.0 software was used for data processing, and count data was expressed as percentage (%), k is the number of data in this experiment, σ 2 is the variance of all survey results, and P < 0.05 indicates that the difference is statistically significant. e formula for calculating reliability is shown in equation (16).…”
Section: Statistical Data Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SPSS23.0 software was used for data processing, and count data was expressed as percentage (%), k is the number of data in this experiment, σ 2 is the variance of all survey results, and P < 0.05 indicates that the difference is statistically significant. e formula for calculating reliability is shown in equation (16).…”
Section: Statistical Data Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Poor motivation and expectation . Contrary to the results shown by (Regmi & Jones, 2020 ) in terms of e-learning, the use of other technology enhanced learning (TEL) in the health sciences field has proven to enrich and facilitate the transmission of didactic content, favoring medical training and motivating the students for example by using virtual or augmented reality (Escalada-Hernández et al, 2019 ; González Izard et al, 2020 ; Izard et al, 2018 ). However, when using robotic technology, the users’ attitudes towards robots is a major concern, as robotic appearance and behavior influences and hinders their acceptance, especially when these robots resemble human beings (Müller et al, 2020 ; Savela et al, 2018 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In terms of usability, most of the problems were related to the user interface design or users' misunderstandings of the terms used in the interface. Although, in many similar studies, the think-aloud method has not been used to evaluate the system prototype [ 23 , 28 , 35 , 40 ], we used this method to solve the usability issues and improve user satisfaction and system acceptance [ 59 61 ]. The think-aloud method is a reliable subjective measure of user experience.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%