2006
DOI: 10.1021/ci600303b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design and Evaluation of a Novel Class-Directed 2D Fingerprint to Search for Structurally Diverse Active Compounds

Abstract: Recent attempts to increase similarity search performance using molecular fingerprints have mostly focused on the evaluation of alternative similarity metrics or scoring schemes, rather than the development of new types of fingerprints. Here, we introduce a novel 2D fingerprint design (property descriptor value range-derived fingerprint or PDR-FP) that involves activity-oriented selection of property descriptors and the transformation of descriptor value ranges into a binary format such that each fingerprint b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
44
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
44
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, for SVM-based ranking, different percentages of 2D-ZINC were used as negative training examples: 0.001%, 0.01%, 0.1%, and 1% corresponding to 14, 144, 1442, and 14 423 compounds, respectively. Activity classes are abbreviated according to Table 1. print search calculations mirror trends that are generally observed; 29,30 that is, search performance is compound-classdependent and varies among different fingerprint designs. In the calculations reported here, on average, Molprint2D produced the highest recovery rates, followed by Daylight, TGT, TGD, and MACCS.…”
Section: Virtual Screening Trialssupporting
confidence: 55%
“…In addition, for SVM-based ranking, different percentages of 2D-ZINC were used as negative training examples: 0.001%, 0.01%, 0.1%, and 1% corresponding to 14, 144, 1442, and 14 423 compounds, respectively. Activity classes are abbreviated according to Table 1. print search calculations mirror trends that are generally observed; 29,30 that is, search performance is compound-classdependent and varies among different fingerprint designs. In the calculations reported here, on average, Molprint2D produced the highest recovery rates, followed by Daylight, TGT, TGD, and MACCS.…”
Section: Virtual Screening Trialssupporting
confidence: 55%
“…This model consumes IPFs to measure the similarity of drug pairs and generate presumed DDIs from the non-intersecting interactions of a pair. The concept of IPFs is similar to the molecular structure fingerprint [23]. After identifying IPFs, the similarity between fingerprints are calculated using JC (refer Fig.…”
Section: Interaction Profile Fingerprintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For comparison, similarity search calculations were also carried out using the complexity-independent PDR-FP. [20] Results and Discussion…”
Section: Calculation Protocolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[20] In contrast to bc-fingerprints, PDR-FP is compound-class-directed (that is, for each activity class, a unique PDR-FP consensus fingerprint is generated) and represents a rather specialized fingerprint type, requiring the application of a dot product metric for similarity assessment. [20] Due to the efforts involved in generating the reference set-specific versions of PDR-FP, we only constructed these fingerprints for the activity classes designed for MACCS. PDR-FP hit rates are reported in Table 7.…”
Section: Comparison Of Bc-maccs With Pdr-fpmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation