1997
DOI: 10.1016/s1350-4533(96)00060-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design and evaluation of a device for measuring three-dimensional micromotions of press-fit femoral stem prostheses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
29
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
29
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We have also verified that this error was sufficient to detect detrimental micromotions, and their location. The maximal amplitude of micromotion was consistent with typical reported values in the literature (Walker et al, 1987;Gilbert et al, 1992;Buhler et al, 1997;Britton et al, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We have also verified that this error was sufficient to detect detrimental micromotions, and their location. The maximal amplitude of micromotion was consistent with typical reported values in the literature (Walker et al, 1987;Gilbert et al, 1992;Buhler et al, 1997;Britton et al, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…However, even if the problem is clearly observed and partly quantified, measurement methods are not fully satisfactory. Most of the studies are using linear variable differential transducers (LVDT's) (Walker et al, 1987;Gilbert et al, 1992;Buhler et al, 1997;Britton et al, 2004;Gheduzzi and Miles, 2007) which do not really measure the local relative micromotion between the stem and the bone, but also include bone deformation between the device fixation and the measurement site. Besides, the number of simultaneous measurement points is limited to 1 or 2, with a reported maximum of 4 (Cristofolini et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This measure is usually divided into subsidence (Steimer et al, 2006) and micromotion (Baleani et al, 2000). Recent studies are mainly using linear variable differential transducers (LVDT's) (Walker et al, 1987;Gilbert et al, 1992;Buhler et al, 1997;Britton et al, 2004;Cristofolini et al, 2007;Gheduzzi and Miles, 2007. LVDT however do not really measure the local relative micromotion between the stem and the bone, but also include bone deformation between the device fixation and the measurement site.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LVDT is one of the most widespread positioning sensors used in harsh environments such as industrial plants, nuclear plants, and particle accelerators, due to contactless sensing, good linearity, virtually infinite resolution, low temperature sensitivity, robustness, and easy-to-implement radiation hardness. Therefore, the LVDT is used in a large variety of applications such as in the industry and in research centers [2]- [6]. It is a differential transformer consisting of one primary and two secondary coils, which are wound around a metallic foil.…”
Section: A Lvdt Working Principlementioning
confidence: 99%